Laserfiche WebLink
2.5.2 Farming <br />Areas that are used for farming (see Section 3.5.2), though much smaller in acre- <br />age than rangeland sustain the heaviest use, e.g. surface disturbance created by <br />plowing, increased compaction from farm equipment, nutrient depletion through <br />crop removal, increased wind and water erosion doting periods prior to vegetative <br />cover establishment, etc. These normal agricultural practices contribute to <br />reduced soil surface stabilization. <br />Wheat is the major cash crop produced in Moffat County, with yields averaging <br />approximately 22 bushels per acre (see Appendix F, Premising Land Use). However <br />in 1980, wheat yield from one field adjacent to Trapper's reclaimed cropland and <br />farmed by a local farmer was approximately 12 bushels/acre (personal communica- <br />tion, Mr. Robert Barnes). In 1980, quadrats were also used to measure wheat pro- <br />duction from the field farmed by Mr. Barnes. An estimated yield of 22.5 bushels/ <br />acre resulted from this sampling. Wheat is generally seeded at about 40 pounds <br />per acre in the fall. Fertilizers are seldan applied because of unpredictable <br />spring moisture patterns. However, herbicide spraying with 3/4 pounds 2,4-D <br />• applied per acre is a common practice (Martin, 1980). <br />The best farming land found within [he proposed permit boundary is rated by the <br />Soil Conservation Service as Class IV. This reflects severe limitations, <br />res[ricting the choice of crops and requiring special management practices. How- <br />ever, because the normal terrain found throughout Moffat County is rocky, hilly, <br />etc., i[ is generally not suitable fur farming and contains major limitations. <br />However, in Moffat County, Class IV land is considered adequate for planting <br />crops since it is the best land available. <br />Within the proposed permit area, ten sites exhibiting signs of possible distur- <br />bance based on vegetative variation Erom aerial photos were examined to determine <br />if these sites were used for farming within a ten year period prior [u mining. <br />The identified areas and results are as follows (see also Map 28): <br />• 2-179 <br />REV 1SED f EB 13 '87 <br />- ~..-_ - <br />