My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-09-25_REVISION - M1980183 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980183
>
2015-09-25_REVISION - M1980183 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:46:00 PM
Creation date
9/28/2015 1:01:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980183
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/25/2015
Doc Name
Amendment #2 Datum Shift Memo AM05
From
Applegate Group
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM5
Email Name
TOD
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Applegate <br />Group, Inc. <br />Water Resource Advisors for the West <br />September 25, 2015 <br />Mr. Tyler O'Donnell <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, RM 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RECEDED <br />SEP 2 5 2015 <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br />MINING AND SAFETY <br />RE: Brannan Sand & Gravel Company Pit 29, Permit No. M-1980-183, Amendment to AM -02, <br />Datum Shift <br />Dear Mr. O'Donnell: <br />This letter updates my letter of September 18, 2015, concerning the AM -02 objection letter filed <br />by Albert Frei & Sons (AFS). That letter identified an AFS concern that there should be "a way <br />to correlate the elevations being proposed in the amendment to [AFS Worthing Pit and <br />Stagecoach Pit] approved elevations so we all know they will not cause a problem we will have <br />to fix later." <br />To clarify my September 18 letter, while the AFS objection letter might suggest that the depth of <br />the french drain be adjusted to a lower elevation if NAVD 88 elevations were consistently used, <br />the wording of the AFS objection suggests only that a survey clarification occur if, as in this <br />case, baseline, pre -mining groundwater elevations were not based on the NAVD 88 survey <br />presently in common use. As detailed below, that survey clarification is appropriate and, with <br />this letter, now part of the AM -02 record. <br />Correction <br />As another initial note, in my September 18 letter, I discussed Brannan's justification for <br />placement of the french drain four feet below the ground surface, and our concern that adjusting <br />this plan to a deeper elevation could have adverse impacts. Specifically, we reported that Mr. <br />Einspahr, the immediate neighbor to the south of AM-02,was concerned about shallow wells and <br />vegetation on his property. We believed it was appropriate to account for these concerns in the <br />design of the french drain regardless of whether they are real or perceived. However, <br />independent of these concerns and based on the detailed discussion below, we believe the french <br />drain is properly located to minimize any disturbance to the prevailing hydrologic balance. <br />Detailed discussion of survey clarification <br />In my September 18 letter, I stated that it is entirely possible that the benchmark french drain <br />elevation of 5007 is the same as the documented pre -mining groundwater surface elevation in <br />this location. I have been able to locate a source to resolve the datum issue. NOAA (specifically <br />the National Geodetic Survey, NGS) has an online tool that converts the old datums to the new <br />datums. <br />7405 W. Highway 50, Suite 123 1490 W. 121" Avenue, Suite 100 118 W. 6`h Street, Suite 100 <br />Salida, CO 81201 Denver, CO 80234 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 <br />303-452-6611 <br />www.applegategroup.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.