My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-09-24_REVISION - C1982056 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2015-09-24_REVISION - C1982056 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:10:57 PM
Creation date
9/24/2015 9:44:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/24/2015
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Twentymile Coal, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
MR287
Email Name
JLE
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sent me depicting the land that has been surveyed for cultural resources, it appears this area has <br />been surveyed. However, the Division cannot locate the results of a survey within the Foidel Creek <br />Mine Permit Confidential Exhibit. Please submit a copy of the cultural resources survey reports) <br />that covers these three areas to be included in Confidential Exhibit 6L. <br />Note that subsequent to transmittal of the Division's Comments, the Division received consultation <br />comments from the SHPO indicating that proposed disturbance for WC -030 would result in "no <br />historic properties affected", the previous historic surveys of the areas associated with the Offset <br />Drilling Zones do not meet current survey standards, that additional cultural resource <br />identification is needed, and that two sites previously identified as potentially eligible for NRHP <br />listing would need to be reevaluated. <br />Response: Given the need for additional cultural resource surveys for the proposed Offset Drilling <br />Zones, TC has contacted Metcalf Archaeology to schedule the additional field work and survey <br />updates, and will provide a supplemental report on receipt. With the additional time required to <br />complete this work, TC will request extension(s) of the permit revision decision date, as appropriate. <br />5) Enclosed is a copy of the reclamation cost estimate the Division conducted for this proposed <br />project. Please acknowledge if TC concurs with the Division's estimate attached. <br />Response: TC has reviewed and accepts the Division's bond reclamation cost calculations as a <br />reasonable estimate of anticipated reclamation costs for the proposed boreholes and associated surface <br />disturbance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.