My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-08-20_REVISION - M2002004 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2015-08-20_REVISION - M2002004 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:23:39 PM
Creation date
8/28/2015 12:07:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/20/2015
Doc Name
Follow-up Response TR05
From
Rio Grande
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR5
Email Name
TOD
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 20, 2015 <br />Mr. Tyler O'Donnell <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />OGCC <br />Rio Grande <br />RECEIVED <br />AUG 0 2 2015 <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br />MINING AND SAFETY <br />RE: Technical Revision to Mining Permit No. M-2002-004 <br />R -off <br />Follow-up Response to Question on August 17, 2015 - Proposed Beneficial Re -Use of a Portion of Kiln Feed <br />Material from the Main Kiln Baghouse in Quarry Area for Reclamation Backfill Purposes <br />GCC Rio Grande, Inc. - Pueblo Cement Plant and Limestone Quarry <br />Dear Mr. O'Donnell: <br />Per your conversation with Brian Mensinger on August 17th, 2015, GCC Rio Grande, Inc. (GCC) has prepared this <br />letter to address your question regarding the depth at which the raw material from the main kiln baghouse is <br />placed during reclamation. This question stemmed from GCC's response to questions submitted to Colorado <br />Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety (DRMS) on August 12, 2015. In the division's letter dated May 27, <br />2015, DRMS asked the following question based on review of GCC's Technical Revision No. 5 (TR -05) submittal: <br />12) The approved post -mining land use for the affected lands is rangeland. The sampling results submitted <br />indicate that there are high concentrations of heavy metals in the dust Will the vegetative species in the <br />approved seed mix absorb or uptake the heavy metals located in the backfilled dust? If plant absorption or <br />uptake of the heavy metals occurs, will bioaccumulation of heavy metals pose a danger to grazing <br />livestock? Could high levels of heavy metals in the soil impair revegetation efforts? <br />GCC provided the following explanation in its August 11, 2015 response: <br />The reclaimed areas will be covered with a separation of approximately one foot of overburden or <br />topsoil used with reclamation thus preventing the vegetation from being able to uptake heavy metals. <br />As a result, this will also prevent bioaccumulation. Providing one foot of topsoil ensures that re - <br />vegetation efforts are not impeded. <br />Also, the results of the MEP tests show that the heavy metals are stable and do not leach thus are <br />unlikely to be available for plant absorption or uptake. <br />At the request of DRMS, GCC proposes an alternate depth of the raw material from the main baghouse in quarry <br />reclamation, which is as follows: <br />Upon completion of reclamation, the raw material from the main baghouse will be three feet beneath the <br />surface, which is equal to one foot of topsoil and two feet of overburden. This measure provides <br />additional assurance that vegetation will not uptake heavy metals and/or minimize bioaccumulation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.