Laserfiche WebLink
Two monitoring wells were completed in 2014 in the Wadge/Wolf Creek Interburden and the Wolf Creek Seam. <br />Well WC008A was drilled to a depth of 556 feet on the east side of the WCR, between the mine area and the Wolf <br />Creek Seam outcrop /subcrop area. Well WC013A was drilled to a depth of 1,456 feet on the west side of the WCR <br />and near the center of the area in which the Wadge Seam is mined and close to the low point of the Twentymile <br />Park Basin. The well locations are shown on Map 23A. <br />Well WC008A is screened from 511 to 556 feet below ground surface (bgs). The Wadge /Wolf Creels Interburden <br />unit at that location is under confined (artesian) conditions, as evidenced by the water level in WC008A being <br />slightly above the land surface. The well flows at a very low rate, and is estimated to have a static water level not <br />more than about 5 feet above the top of the casing, or approximately 6,780 feet amsl. The flowing condition is not <br />unexpected at that location, considering that the depth to water in nearby Wadge Overburden Well 008 -77 -58 is on <br />the order of 6 feet bgs, and the outcrop /subcrop areas of the Wadge/Wolf Creek Interburden and the Wolf Creek <br />Seam, which are areas of natural recharge, generally occur at higher elevations than those of the Wadge Seam. <br />Well WC013A is screened from 1,411 to 1,456 feet bgs, through an interval containing the Wolf Creek Seam and <br />Wadge /Wolf Creek Interburden. The depth to the static water level is 1,242 feet from the top of the well casing <br />(approximately 1,239 feet bgs), and the static water level elevation is approximately 5,519 feet amsl. That water <br />level elevation is about 100 feet above the Wadge Seam, but it is several hundred feet lower than would have been <br />estimated by projecting the hydraulic gradient from the Wadge Overburden wells south of WC013A. T he low <br />water level elevation suggests two possibilities: 1) The greater consolidation and low permeability of the <br />Wadge /Wolf Creek Interburden strongly limits groundwater flow through the unit in a bedding - parallel direction as <br />well as vertically, thereby hydrologically isolating the Wadge/Wolf Creek Interburden, particularly in the deeper <br />part of the Twentymile Park Basin, and /or 2) Dewatering of the existing Wadge mine workings has lowered <br />hydrostatic pressures in the Wadge Seam and Wadge Overburden, and vertical hydraulic communication has <br />allowed hydrostatic pressures in the Wadge /Wolf Creek Interburden in that area to respond to the lowered pressures <br />in the overlying units. <br />Wells WCOOA8 and WC013A were slug- tested to determine the hydraulic characteristics of the Wolf Creek Seam <br />and Wadge/Wolf Creek Interburden. The WC008A test was conducted by first inserting a slug designed to cause <br />approximately 5.6 feet of water -level change within the 4 -inch diameter well casing, which caused the well to <br />overflow but did not raise the water level since the initial water level was at the top of the casing. The slug was <br />then rapidly removed from the well, suddenly lowering the water level. The water -level recovery over time was <br />measured and recorded with a pressure transducer and data - logger for approximately 100 minutes, then manually <br />until approximately 26 hours after the start of the test. In the first 100 minutes, the water level recovered 0.52 foot <br />and in the first 6 hours approximately 1.4 foot. The WC013A test was conducted by pouring 15 gallons of tap water <br />into the well through 1 -inch diameter polyethylene tubing which had been inserted to slightly below the static water <br />level, which raised the water level approximately 23 feet. The gradual decline of the water level over the <br />subsequent 132 hours was measured and recorded with a pressure transducer and data - logger. <br />The results of the testing are summarized below, and the test data and analysis details are included in Exhibit 9. <br />The hydraulic conductivity determined from analysis of the data from both tests was nearly identical and indicative <br />of rocks with very limited permeability that would typically comprise an aquitard. <br />Wolf Creek Seam and Wadge/Wolf Creek Interburden monitoring Well WC -008A was initially sampled, with <br />sampling results provided for baseline review. A sample could not be obtained from Well WC -013A, however, <br />both wells will be purged and sampled as part of TC's ongoing hydrologic monitoring program. <br />TR13 -83 2.04 -22.1 11/17/14 <br />Hydraulic <br />Saturated Thickness <br />Tare <br />Well ID <br />Test Date <br />Conductivity <br />of Tested Interval <br />feet d <br />(square feet per day) <br />(feet/day) <br />feet <br />WC008 <br />10/01/2014 <br />0.0016 <br />35 <br />0.056 <br />WC013 <br />10/ <br />0.0015 <br />45 <br />0.067 <br />Wolf Creek Seam and Wadge/Wolf Creek Interburden monitoring Well WC -008A was initially sampled, with <br />sampling results provided for baseline review. A sample could not be obtained from Well WC -013A, however, <br />both wells will be purged and sampled as part of TC's ongoing hydrologic monitoring program. <br />TR13 -83 2.04 -22.1 11/17/14 <br />