My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-08-18_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2015-08-18_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:10:00 PM
Creation date
8/19/2015 1:06:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/18/2015
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04 Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Modeling of surface water conditions has been utilized as set forth in Exhibit 8, Sediment Control Plan. <br />Characteristics of surface runoff, peak flow, reservoir routing, sediment yield, and theoretical detention time have <br />been modeled using the techniques described in "Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado' (USDA, <br />SCS 1977) and "Applied Hydrology and Sedimentology For Disturbed Areas" (Barfield, Warner and Haan 1981). <br />These techniques have been incorporated into the DEPOSITS model, which has been utilized in the design of <br />treatment facilities for the underground mine. Finally, streamflow and water quality in streams draining the general <br />area has been modeled using the WATBAL model, for the purposes of the assessment of probable hydrologic <br />consequences of mining on surface water, required by Rule 2.05.6(3). Modeling of ground water conditions has been <br />utilized in this application, specifically under Rule 2.05.6(3) and in Exhibit 9, Aquifer Test Data. Dewatering, <br />drawdown and solute transport characteristics have been modeled using the analytical methods described in "Ground <br />Water Hydraulics" (Lohman 1979), "Selected Handheld Calculator Codes for the Evaluation of the Cumulative <br />Hydrologic Impacts of Mining" USDI Office of Surface Mining 1981, and the finite- difference GRWATER computer <br />model described in "Ground Water Hydrology and Hydraulic" (McWhorter and Sunada 1977). <br />(3) Permit applications may comply with the requirements of 2.04.5(1), 2.04.6(1)(a), 2.04.6(2)(a) and 2.04.7 <br />by providing accurate descriptive and predictive information relating to geology, water gualfty and quanti1y for the <br />area to be affected over the estimated life of the operation based upon extrapolation by an expert in the field from <br />documented data on the geology, water quality and quantity of similar areas, provided that the data used by the <br />expert is included within the permit application, the expert opinion is approved by the Division and all such data are <br />made available to the oublic for review and comment. <br />RESPONSE <br />The information and analysis referenced above represents over five years of data collection in the permit and adjacent <br />area by Federal and State agencies, private organizations and universities. Conclusions and opinions of experts of <br />each field may be found in the accompanying exhibits. The conclusions and opinions were derived by extrapolation <br />of the data collected in the permit and adjacent areas. <br />Rule 2.04.6 - GeolOLyy Description <br />(1) General Requirements <br />The geology description shall include a description of the geology (stratigraphy and structure) within the <br />proposed permit and adjacent areas. This description shall be sufficient in detail to: <br />(a) Define the relationship between structural geology and the occurrence, movement, <br />quality and quantity of potentially impacted surface and groundwater; <br />(b) Assist in determining the feasibility of the proposed reclamation plan; <br />(c) Assess the potential for off -site material damage to the hydrologic balance; <br />(d) Assist in the preparation of the probable hydrologic consequence statement and the <br />establishment of the hydrologic monitoring plan; and <br />(e) Assist in the preparation of the subsidence control plan under 2.05.6(6). <br />RESPONSE <br />The information required by this rule can be found in the responses provided to Rule 2.04.6 (3). The text for this <br />response starts on page 2.04 -12.1 and onto 2.04 -19. This referenced section addresses the general geology <br />discussion required by this rule. Additional information addressing the hydrologic component of this rule can be <br />found in Rule 2.04.7. The text for this rule can be found on pages 2.04 -19 through 2.04 -43. <br />In reference to the geologic information presented and the overburden characterization associated with addressing the <br />feasibility of the reclamation plan it should be noted that the TCC facilities are located next to the Colorado Yampa <br />Coal Company reclaimed surface mine. The surface mine has been successfully reclaimed and the TCC surface <br />facilities will utilize the same resources and reclamation techniques as applied to the surface mine. <br />MR14 -282 2.04 -12 09/08/14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.