My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-08-07_REVISION - C1981019 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2015-08-07_REVISION - C1981019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:09:48 PM
Creation date
8/7/2015 2:05:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/7/2015
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR4
Email Name
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D <br />Mr. Rob Zuber <br />August 3, 2015 <br />Page 8 <br />ITEM 26. Regarding the Section 36 Pond, the barrel diameter is 24 " in Table 1 but 18 " on <br />drawing. Please address this apparent error. <br />Response: The barrel diameter is 24 inches in both the model and in Exh. 7-23C, Table 1. <br />Figure C-7, the design drawing for the Section 36 pond, was in error regarding the text label, <br />although the pipe as drawn is correctly represented. It is resubmitted herein. <br />ITEM 27. Regarding the Middle Pond bottom elevation, the drawing and Table I are not in <br />agreement. Please address this apparent error. <br />Response: Table 1 of Exh. 7-23C has been revised to match the design drawing. <br />ITEM 28. Regarding the .Section 25 Pond, Table 1 has an error for peak discharge for <br />emergency spillway. Also, the elevation at the bottom of the primary spillway (7050.0) is an <br />error. Please address these errors. <br />Response: In regard to the error for the peak discharge to the emergency spillway, this error has <br />been corrected as previously noted in our response to Item 17. We are not able to find any errors <br />in Table 1 concerning the elevation of the primary spillway invert. As shown in the design <br />drawing, this elevation is set at 6872.0. <br />ITEM 29. On Figure Cl (and other similar figures), what is the pink line? It is not in legends. <br />Response: This line represents the lowermost toe of the spoil dump. This has been added to the <br />legend on all Exh. 7-23, Figure C 1 through C4. <br />ITEM 30. Drainage area to Lower D-2 Ditch: why does it not include a portion ofthe 55.75 <br />acre sub -watershed? Per the model, all of this reports to D-1 Lower Ditch. Please explain why <br />because this does not look correct per the topography. <br />Response: It is agreed that a portion of this 55.75 acre area may be contributory to the Lower <br />D2 Ditch. The parcel has been subdivided into a 16.95 acre parcel contributory to the ditch and a <br />38.80 acre parcel that is not. Figures Cl, C2, and the associated SEDCAD models have been <br />revised as a result of this comment. <br />Exhibit 7-23, Part D <br />ITEM 31. Page D-2 is missing. Please provide this missing page. <br />�t. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.