Laserfiche WebLink
In addition to the clear and unambiguous statements of Division staff, TAC asserts that the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Act requires that a pilot test of UBHM, as described in the current NO1 Modification <br />Application, is properly identified as a "development' activity rather than a "prospecting" activity to be <br />conducted under an NO1. <br />Under the Act, Development is defined as: "Development" means the work performed in relation to a <br />deposit, following the prospecting required to prove minerals are in existence in commercial quantities but <br />prior to production activities, aimed at, but not limited to, preparing the site for mining, defining further <br />the ore deposit by drilling or other means, conducting pilot plant operations, constructing roads or <br />ancillaryfacilities, and other related activities. [CRS 34-32-103 Definition (4), (emphasis added)) <br />Black Range has clearly stated that its "exploration"/prospecting of the Hansen orebody is complete. As <br />early as October 24, 2011, BLR announced "Drilling Program Completed at the Hansen Uranium Deposit". <br />The announcement stated: "It is noted that numerous holes drilled during the recently completed <br />program were located primarily to evaluate geotechnical conditions, rather than to evaluate resource <br />grade, thickness and continuity, which has been well defined with the abundance of previous drilling <br />data." <br />On April 24, 2012 BLR announced "Black Range Selects Development Approach for Hansen Uranium <br />Project" The announcement stated: "Scoping study confirms underground borehole mining with ablation <br />as the best approach for development of the Hansen Uranium Deposit; Operating costs from the scoping <br />study are estimated at US$30/Ib U3O8 at a production rate of 2MIb U3O8 per annum." <br />On April 23, 2014, BLR announced "Hansen/Taylor Ranch Uranium Project—JORC Code 2012 Mineral <br />Resource Estimate". This announcement, which confirmed and restated the same results published in July <br />2011 under the earlier version of the (Australian) JORC Code, specified in great detail, the location, <br />quantity, grade, thickness, cut-off grades, geology, drilling and sampling techniques, etc. <br />On July 31, 2015, BLR announced its June 2015 Quarterly Activities Report. The highlights of the report <br />included: "Hansen/Taylor Ranch Uranium Project — Continued to acquire baseline environmental data and <br />to advance mine permitting activities." <br />Please see: www.blackrangeminerals.com, Investor Relations, ASX Announcements, by date. <br />It should be noted that the second modification to the NO1, which was approved in November of 2012 <br />following the withdrawal of the TAC appeal, authorized additional "exploration" drilling in addition to the <br />construction of the five monitoring wells. No exploration drilling has been done at the Hansen site since <br />2011. <br />BLR has made numerous announcements over the past two plus years that it is conducting pre -mining <br />baseline environmental data sampling and that it has commenced the "mine permitting process". Black <br />Range Minerals is no longer conducting prospecting activities but rather is now attempting to establish the <br />viability of the unproven underground borehole mining technology by conducting a pilot test. <br />Tallahassee Area Community was disappointed that this NO1 Modification request was not immediately <br />rejected on procedural grounds by DRMS staff. For over two and one-half years TAC and other interested <br />parties have relied on the numerous unambiguous statements of DRMS staff that any application for <br />utilization of the UBHM process at Hansen would be by an "appropriate mining permit" thereby making <br />the clear implication that BLR would be subject to the Hard Rock/Metal Mining Rules governing a <br />