Laserfiche WebLink
7/29/2015 State.co.us ExecLAive Branch Mail-Re:Monitoring well <br /> lack of water information, particularly since there are two monitoring wells now functioning, MW23 up gradient <br /> and MW65 down gradient? <br /> The other landowners have their reasons for wanting a new monitoring well. One reason is their belief that the <br /> ground water is contaminated although the MW23 and MW65 manganese, their main focus of contamination, <br /> levels are not above Colorado Health Department maximum agriculture limits. A second reason is for use as <br /> a water well, which is not the purpose nor the intent of a monitoring well. <br /> Therefore, I believe that the correct decision is from a safety approach. Please do not force Energy Fuels to <br /> drill another monitoring well that may result in a second underground coal fire on our property. <br /> Doug Corley <br /> https:flmail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=e29129fcb5&vi ew=pt&search=i nbox&th=14e92233bfe7ebda&si m 1=14e92233bfe7ebda 2/2 <br />