My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-07-21_REVISION - C1982056 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2015-07-21_REVISION - C1982056 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:09:17 PM
Creation date
7/29/2015 9:55:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/21/2015
Doc Name
Adequacy Review No. 3
From
DRMS
To
Twentymile Coal Company
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
JLE
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Twentymile Coal, LLC. <br />Page 13 <br />July 21, 2015 <br />b. Division's response: <br />i. Revised page 2.06-25.7 references two reports in Exhibit 7e-2 and 7e4. The <br />Division believes TC meant to reference Exhibit 4e-2 and 4e-4. Please revise <br />this page accordingly. <br />ii. Revised page 2.06-25.8 indicates that TC conducted a vegetation study on the <br />Fish Creek AVF; this study is located in Exhibit 7J-1 of the permit. This page <br />indicates that productivity between the AVF bottomlands and uplands are not <br />significantly different. However, upon review of Exhibit 7J-1, the data indicates <br />the production from the valley floor is about twice that of the upland area. Given <br />this, the statement made on Page 2.06-25.8 does not appear to be correct. Please <br />revise this page and evaluate if the conclusion drawn is still accurate. <br />iii. The State of Colorado owns a significant amount of land in the area to be <br />subsided. Please provide documentation that the reduction in pastureland/grazing <br />land as a result of subsidence induced flooding will not significantly interrupt, <br />discontinue or preclude agricultural activities on State land. <br />iv. Revised Page 2.06-25.9 indicates that there are areas where sub -irrigation occurs <br />within the AVF. Map 5 of Exhibit 4e depicts areas where sub -irrigation occurs <br />along Fish Creek. Please evaluate the impact mining in the WCR will have on <br />these areas that are sub -irrigated and to what degree mining may interrupt, <br />discontinue or preclude agricultural activities on these areas. <br />v. Revised Page 2.06-205.9 indicates that water quality is monitored at Station 900 <br />on Foidel Creek downstream of previous mining in the Eastern Mining District <br />and the proposed mining in the WCR. This station appears to be upstream of the <br />proposed mining in the WCR. Please revise this page accordingly. <br />8. Please submit an environmental monitoring program that includes hydrologic monitoring, <br />vegetation monitoring and subsidence monitoring similar to the one submitted as Exhibit 4e-7 <br />(Fish Creek AVF Monitoring Program) for mining in the NMD. This plan should be designed <br />based on mining of the Wolf Creek Reserve and the projected impacts on the AVFs of Foidel and <br />Fish Creek. <br />a. TC's response: Please recognize that extensive resource and impact monitoring and <br />analyses were completed to validate the initial mining activities and related subsidence <br />effects for the Fish Creek AVF. The results of these extensive monitoring and related <br />analysis efforts confirmed that the projected surface subsidence and related subsidence <br />effects on surface and ground water hydrology and vegetation communities were <br />consistent with actual measured subsidence and subsidence effects. All subsequent <br />mining, subsidence evaluations, monitoring requirements, and impact analyses tiered off <br />and were built on this foundation of confirmed mining and impact results. Given these <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.