Laserfiche WebLink
O <br />Mr. Rob Zuber <br />July 21, 2015 <br />Page 2 <br />H. Response Accepted. <br />12. Response Accepted. <br />Rule 3.02.2 — Determination of Performance Bond <br />13. The Division has completed the portion of the technical adequacy that would <br />potentially change the reclamation cost estimate. We will start to calculate the <br />new estimate for TR -105. <br />Rules 4.13 and 4.14 — Contemporaneous Reclamation and Baclq�tlling and Grading <br />14. Response Accepted. <br />15. Response Accepted. <br />16. Response Partially Accepted. The Division will not be able to propose a decision <br />on TR -105 until the landowner letters have been submitted. <br />Response: All of the landowner consent letters were provided in a separate submittal in a <br />letter dated July 14, 2015. <br />Rule 4.27 — Operations on Steep Slopes <br />17. Response Partially Accepted. Page 4.27-1 in Volume 1 has been updated <br />but the analogous pages) discussing steep slope mining in South Taylor in <br />Volumes 12 has not been updated. Please either revise the text in Volume 12, <br />Rule 4.27 (starting on page South Taylor/Lower Wilson — Rule 4, Page 22) with <br />current information or eliminate it. <br />Response: Pages 23 and 24 of the South Taylor/Lower Wilson Rule 4 have been <br />modified as requested. <br />Rule 4.05 — Hydrologic Balance <br />18 The following items are related to the SEDCAD modeling provided in Exhibit 7. <br />a. Response Accepted. <br />b. Response Accepted. <br />C. The sub -watersheds are still not delineated in a conventional way. It <br />appears that the only criterion is curve numbers, and the end result is basins that <br />A Tot [Q Earrr}'k-ooperative <br />