Laserfiche WebLink
copy of the permit, one can be supplied in digital format by requesting such from Schmidt or the <br />largish permit file can be reviewed at the Corps offices near Chatfield Reservoir in Littleton. As <br />Schmidt scanned the complete and quite large file a few years ago and has everything since then, <br />requesting a digital copy from Schmidt would likely be the best route to update the Land Board files <br />so the State can become familiar with what is expected in the future and what was done in the past. <br />MINING ACTIVITY IN THE LAST YEAR: <br />Depth of mining - In the last year, mining depths were consistent and similar to previous <br />years. Mining depth reached down to considerable depth, but well within the maximum. <br />Overburden production in the last year was less than has been the case in the past couple of <br />years. In fact, the amount of overburden in stockpiles declined considerably as even more <br />backfilling in mined out and unusable portions of the pit has begun. There is still plenty of fill <br />available to properly backfill the pit. The overburden is being stockpiled adjacent to the <br />mining area so backfilling can be done easily and economically. Soil was salvaged as <br />required. The pit as a whole primarily expanded to the north along the eastern edge of the <br />mining limit and is now swinging westward on the northern side of the existing pit. A new <br />soil stockpile has begun to be formed to the north of the pit on land that seems to have little <br />sand present. However, this stockpile is still quite small and shallow. A closer stockpile of <br />soil is needed to avoid having to haul soil all the way to the main stockpile near the ranch <br />facilities. That is now a little too far to be economically acceptable. <br />2. Backfilling - A small amount of additional backfilling of the current mining area was done <br />in the last year. All of the backfilling occurred in the mining pit area and primarily involved <br />two permanent fill areas and one tentative backfill area. Backfilling behind the operation on <br />the southern edge of the pit continued. A small area on the eastern edge of the pit was also <br />backfilled. One area on the south side of the deep clay pocket was tentatively backfilled. This <br />may or may not be permanent, but becaue the fill material is similar to the undisturbed <br />material behind it, even if it is eventually merged with that material and reconfigured the fill <br />will already be in the proper location for backfilling. The other two backfill areas are <br />obviously more permanent, but still unfinished in many ways. More work will likely be done <br />on backfilling in the coming winter when mining demand is not so great. <br />A. Depth of backfilling - The backfill that was placed is not finished backfill and <br />therefore the current depth may or may not be final. In general, the fill depth was to a <br />depth sufficient to get close to an estimated final depth, but until more mining is done <br />and more land is available for filling, completion of the fill in these areas cannot be <br />done. <br />B. Material used in backfilling - Backfilling at the current mining pit primarily used <br />overburden plus some wash fines from the processing plant. <br />C. Maximum, minimum, and average slopes - Finished slopes in all the backfilled <br />areas in the pit are far from completion and therefore any statement of slope gradients <br />in these areas would be premature. <br />Status report for 2015 due July 15, 2015 Page 3 of 10 <br />