My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-06-22_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2015-06-22_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:08:36 PM
Creation date
7/14/2015 7:49:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/22/2015
Doc Name
CMWB Final Design, WESTEC Report, June 1996
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume IV Coal Mine Waste Bank Final Design for the mine
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
waste bank is the Mancos Shale Formation, which forms the steep slopes below the Rollins <br />• member. <br />According to geologic hazards maps for the area (USGS, 1978b1, rockfalls and expansive soils <br />are potential hazards at this site. Rockfalls were evident in the vertical Rollins sandstone rock <br />outcrops above the proposed coal mine waste bank, and the colluvial material found on the <br />hillside. Rockfalls are not expected to be a factor in design, but may prove to be a <br />maintenance issue, (i.e., removing fallen rock fragments from the waste bank during the life <br />of the project). No remedial activities need to be conducted to prevent rockfalls in the area. <br />Expansive soils originate from the Mancos shale underlying the site that become wetted from <br />rain or the placing of coal waste with a high moisture content. Effects of expanding soils can <br />be minimized by quickly routing water away from contact with the shale. The planned <br />underdrain system will channel any water within the coal mine waste bank to the toe, and the <br />diversion ditch system will route excess runoff from the waste bank to reduce contact with <br />the Mancos shale. <br />• 2.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br />Due to steep terrain and vehicle access problems, two geotechnical boreholes were completed <br />on the hillside of the proposed waste bank. Three additional boreholes were drilled in the area <br />of the toe in the old coal loading area. The location of these boreholes is shown on Figure <br />2.1. The two hillside holes, WBH-B1 and -82 were drilled to determine the depth of colluvial <br />materials, to obtain material strengths, and to confirm depths to the Mancos Shale Formation. <br />Boreholes WBH-B3, -B4, and -B5 were important in determining strengths of foundation <br />materials at the toe of the proposed waste pile. They also determined depths to the Mancos <br />formation. In Borehole WBH-84, a piezometer was installed to monitor subsurface water <br />conditions. <br />The boreholes were drilled by a local drilling contractor using a Central Mining Equipment <br />(CME) model 55 drill rig. A 4-inch solid or 7.5-inch hollow stem auger was used to drill <br />through the unconsolidated material. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) drives were taken <br />within this unconsolidated material using standard American Society for Testing and Materials <br />(ASTM) methods, including a 2-inch outside diameter (O.D.) split-spoon sampler and 140 <br />• pound (Ib) drop hammer. Drives were usually taken in 5-foot depth intervals to 20 feet, then <br />96266/1424.RPT Coel Mine Weste Bank Final Design for the Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />June 1998 WESTEC 3 <br />ADCpUACY-O] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.