My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-07-10_INSPECTION - M1999034
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1999034
>
2015-07-10_INSPECTION - M1999034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:09:04 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 4:45:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999034
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
7/10/2015
Doc Name
Report
From
Aggregate Industries
To
DRMS
Inspection Date
7/2/2015
Email Name
TOD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M-1999-034 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: TOD <br />INSPECTION DATE: July 2, 2015 <br />This inspection was conducted to observe and evaluate the site conditions described by the City's representative. <br />During the inspection, the Division observed an earthen berm along the western bank of the River (Photo 1). The <br />earthen berm was created by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD). The Division believes that the <br />earthen berm was created by UDFCD in an effort to keep the River within its channel. The earthen embankment <br />between the River and the reservoir complex appeared to have been damaged downgradient from the southeast corner <br />of Phase 2 (Figure 1). It appeared that the damage to the UDFCD earthen berm provided a path for flow to be diverted <br />from the River around the berm, thereby allowing the flow to overtop the southeast corner of reclamation phase 2 <br />(Figure 1). <br />During the inspection, the Division observed a breach between the River and Phase 2 (Photo 2). The breach occurred <br />in the southeastern portion of phase 2 (Figure 1 and Photo 2). The breach was estimated to be approximately 150 feet <br />wide. The breach has headcut back to the River, eroding the land between the River and phase 2. The breach eroded <br />the upper portion of the slurry wall. <br />A smaller breach previously occurred at the same location during the fall 2013 flood. The Division observed the fall <br />2013 flood damage during a previous monitoring inspection conducted in June of 2015. The Operator never repaired <br />the 2013 flood damage. A headcut feature is visible on a Google Earth image dating back to October 2013, just after <br />the 2013 flood. A large erosion channel is visible on the October 2013 Google Earth image. The feature spans from <br />the southeast corner of phase 2 and towards the River (October 2013 Google Earth image). The October 2013 and <br />October 2014 Google Earth images clearly show erosion of the land located between the River and Phase 2. The <br />October 2014 Google Earth image clearly shows deposition of material into the bottom of Phase 2. After reviewing <br />the Google Earth images it appears that the UDFCD earthen embankment was repaired shortly after the 2013 flood; <br />however, it appears that no repair work ever took place at the breach and headcut. The most recent breach occurred at <br />the same location as the 2013 flood breach. The 2013 flood damage provided a preferential path for flow, the most <br />recent occurrence caused the breach to be enlarged and divert a portion of the River through the reservoir complex. <br />The breach in turn has diverted a portion of the South Platte River flow into phase 2 and throughout the reservoir <br />complex. Figure 1 on page 5 details the flow path of the diverted flow. During the inspection the flow in the South <br />Platte River was approximately 2400 to 3000 CFS (Chart 1). The flow of the River diverted into the pit was estimated <br />to be approximately 1/3 of the current river flow (approximately 750 to 1500 CFS). The water from the River was <br />flowing through the breach into phase 2. The diverted flow had completely filled all 3 phases of the reservoir complex. <br />After all 3 phases were inundated, water was flowing over the earthen berms between all of the phases. The diverted <br />flow was circuiting through the reservoir complex and draining back to the River. The diverted flow was overtopping <br />the earthen embankment between phases 2 and 3. A portion of the earthen embankment between phases 2 and 3 had <br />been completely eroded away (Photo 3). After the diverted flow entered phase 3, the water flowed overtop of the <br />earthen embankment between phases 3 and 4 (Photo 4). After the diverted flow entered phase 4, the majority of the <br />flow returned to the main River channel through an emergency spillway. The emergency spillway was constructed <br />along the eastern side of Phase 4 (Photo 7). Some of the excess flow is overtopping Phases 3 and 4, flowing directly <br />into the River (Photos 5 and 6). The flow overtopping Phases 3 and 4 has damaged land between the River and the <br />reservoirs (Photo 5). <br />On July 8, 2015, the Division received an email from the Operator's representative (enclosed). In the email the <br />Operator's representative notified the Division about a pit breach in phase 3. The Operator's representative explained <br />that the eastern bank of phase 3 had failed. The Operator's representative explained that water was flowing from <br />phase 3 back to the River. <br />The Division conducted a follow up inspection on July 9, 2015, to observe and evaluate the site conditions described <br />by the Operator's representative. Aggregate Industries - WCR, Inc., was notified of the inspection date and time. <br />Aggregate Industries was not present during the follow-up inspection. The City of Thornton was represented by Josh <br />Redman, and Walt Jenkins during the follow-up inspection. During the follow-up inspection, the Division observed a <br />breach between the River and Phase 3 (photo 8). The breach occurred in the eastern portion of phase 3 (Photo 9). The <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.