My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-06-12_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2015-06-12_REVISION - C1980007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:08:28 PM
Creation date
6/22/2015 11:02:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/12/2015
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings
From
DRMS
To
Mountain Coal Company, LLC
Type & Sequence
SL6
Email Name
JRS
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
there appeared to be good species diversity. Dominant grasses included bluebunch wheatgrass, <br />slender wheatgrass and mountain brome. The dominant forbs appeared to be yarrow and alfalfa <br />(the alfalfa was mainly on the borrow area). There were shrubs starting to grow along the <br />margins of the disturbed areas, with Gamble's oak being the main shrub. The upper half of the <br />power line corridor (as it moves up the side of the mountain) is completely filled in with <br />oakbrush, so the disturbance is no longer visible. There was some musk thistle on the lower <br />portion of the power line corridor and the portal area. <br />The vegetation on drill pads 14-06, 14-07 and 14-08 was very good. There was good cover and <br />there appeared to be good species diversity. Dominant grasses included bluebunch wheatgrass <br />and slender wheatgrass. Forbs included yarrow and bluebell. There were shrubs starting to grow <br />on the pads, with snowberry and Gamble's oak being the main shrubs. <br />A review of the vegetation monitoring reports, which were conducted in 2012 and 2013, showed <br />that all of the requirements of the reclamation plan, as it pertains to revegetation, have been met. <br />Detailed information on the vegetation monitoring process and results can be found in the SL -06 <br />application package. <br />While protection of the hydrologic balance is also a Phase III Bond Release criterion, the <br />Division is deferring any analysis at this time. The reason for this is the fact that the bond <br />release areas are small areas that lie above vast workings that are still in communication with one <br />another. Any determinations regarding the hydrology would be premature at this point. <br />Summary and Conclusions <br />Based upon a review of the mine permit, the applicant's bond release application and site <br />inspections, the Division finds that MCC has met the requirements set forth in Rule 3.03 for the <br />areas included in the partial Phase III Bond Release SL -06 application. <br />IV. PROPOSED DECISION <br />Based on the observations above, the Division proposes to approve the Mountain Coal Company, <br />LLC's request for a Partial Phase III Bond Release for the West Elk Mine. This proposed decision <br />will release the applicant from all liability for Phase III Bond Release criteria Lone Pine area, <br />Thermal Event area and the West Point area, totaling 24.2 acres. The Division proposes to release <br />$69,761.00 for the Partial Phase III Bond Release SL -06. <br />West Elk Mine 6 12 June 2015 <br />Partial Phase III Bond Release SL -06 Findings <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.