My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-06-04_ENFORCEMENT - C1981035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2015-06-04_ENFORCEMENT - C1981035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:01:24 PM
Creation date
6/4/2015 9:10:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/4/2015
Doc Name
Notice of Proposed Amount of Civil Penalty
From
DRMS
To
GCC Energy, LLC
Violation No.
CV2015001
Email Name
MLT
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment <br />GCC Energy, LLC / The King Coal Mine <br />NOV CV -2015-001— Issued May 7, 2015 <br />June 4, 2015 <br />Materials reviewed: DBMS Inspection Reports (4/21/15; 5/18/15); DRMS NOV CV -2015-001 (5/7/15); <br />GCC letter to DBMS (5/26/15). <br />History [Rule 5.04.5(3)(a)]: <br />No NOVs have been issued at this mine during the 12 months preceding the issuance of this NOV. <br />The History component is therefore proposed to be set at $0. <br />Seriousness [Rule 5.04.5(3)(b)]: <br />The Seriousness component of a proposed assessment may range from $0 to $1750. The amount <br />proposed depends upon whether the violation was one of performance requirements or of <br />administrative requirements. This NOV was written for a violation of performance requirements. <br />In the case of a violation of performance requirements, the amount to be assessed for Seriousness <br />depends upon (1) the probability of the occurrence of the event which a violated standard is <br />designed to prevent, and (2) the duration and extent of the potential or actual damage in terms of <br />area and impact on the public or environment. <br />(1) Events that standards are designed to prevent did in fact occur. A coal stockpile was enlarged <br />without prior Division approval. Additionally, a disturbed area runoff ditch was filled in, <br />creating a small probability that disturbed runoff might not have reported to a sediment pond. <br />(2) The extent of the actual impact was relatively small. Duration is unknown. <br />The Seriousness component of this assessment is therefore proposed to be set at $250. <br />Fault [Rule 5.04.5(3)(c)]: <br />The fault component of a proposed civil penalty assessment may range from $0 to $1500. <br />Assessments of "unavoidable" violations may range from $0 to $250. Assessments for violations <br />that were the result of "negligence" may range from $250 to $750. Assessments for violations that <br />resulted from "intentional conduct" may range from $750 to $1500. <br />Permittees are expected to operate and maintain coal stockpile areas in compliance with the rules. <br />This NOV appears to have occurred as a result of a moderate degree of negligence. <br />The Fault component is therefore proposed to be set at $500. <br />Good Faith in Achieving Compliance [Rule 5.04.5(3)(d)]: <br />It appears GCC took immediate steps to abate the NOV in the shortest time possible and before <br />the required abatement deadline. The permittee has implemented extra steps (the use of stakes to <br />delineate the limits of the stockpile) so as to reduce the possibility of another violation. <br />Good faith credit in the amount of $250 is therefore proposed. <br />The Total Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment for this NOV is therefore set at $500. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.