Laserfiche WebLink
May 28 15 08:00p Joellen 9708647682 p.7 <br />got all their farming FREE, and they still got to keep their <br />production and reap the rewards without ever lifting a <br />finger. Western Fuels had ALL that expense, ask Ross, <br />and the farmers just ate it up. They couldn't care less <br />whether bond release was met because they had to do <br />nothing to get all their crops. As rule 1.04 states, <br />pasturelands is for grazing with little or no production and <br />all these farmers got two and three cuttings per year free. <br />150 ton at 125 dollars per ton for most years, free. Some <br />of the farmers were selling for 300 dollars per ton in the <br />years of the drought in texas and all over. I am the only <br />one that stayed at 100 per ton. Mel Staats shipped all his <br />out at that cost one year. So, if you examine those rules <br />and you will clearly see by looking at the applications for <br />Bond release that it is not production that is holding it up. <br />The State maintains their rules depending on who has the <br />job. Also, if you look at the letters written, Bond was not <br />top priority whenever other needs wanted to be met such <br />as the farmers and their free production and the haul pac <br />road, and the water(pond) issue. We are one of those <br />farmers after 15 years will finally get our FIRST <br />production off this prime farmland but OUR main priority <br />is to get WFC and the STATE out of our lives, so <br />production will be ACHIEVED in the ten year time <br />frame. We also will be getting FREE production off the <br />place at WFC's expense but, we want our lives back and <br />our farms. The original landowners involved in East of <br />