Laserfiche WebLink
Case 10 -03623 -AJC Doc 184 Filed 05/05/15 Page 7 of 15 <br />Order of December 30, 2009 (D.E. 74 in the main case; D.E. 63 in the Subcon Adversary <br />Proceeding). <br />12. On April 2, 2010, the Subcon Order and the Judgment were recorded in Boulder <br />County, Colorado—the Subcon Order was recorded on March 4, 2010 (No. 03061827 and No. <br />03061908) and the Judgment was recorded on March 31, 2010 (No. 03066736). <br />This 363 Adversary <br />13. On September 29, 2010, the Trustee brought this instant 363 Adversary Proceeding <br />against Defendants, and other now dismissed defendants (D.E. 1), in connection with the Trustee's <br />attempts to sell these and other mines in the Main Case (D.E. 167, 245, 254 & 256 in the Main Case). <br />14. This Court hasjurisdiction over this 363 Adversary Proceeding, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. <br />§1334(b) and the standing Order of Reference to the Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District <br />of Florida, entered by the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, pursuant to <br />28 U.S.C. §157(a). <br />15. Subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §157(b) as a case under <br />title 11 and a core proceedings arising under title 11, or arising in a case under title 11 in <br />accordance with 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2). <br />16. Venue of this 363 Adversary Proceeding in this district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. <br />§§ 1408 and 1409. <br />The Sale of the Bueno and Black Rose N inine Properties <br />17. The last of these §363 Sale Motions, dated August 3, 2011, was for the sale of <br />these Bueno and Black Rose Mining Properties (D.E. 256 in the Main Case). <br />18. Each of the Bueno and Black Rose Mining Properties consist of the mining rights <br />and claims in mines, and partition thereof into allocable defined sections is impracticable due to <br />7 <br />