Laserfiche WebLink
olive, One -seed Juniper, Rocky Mountain Juniper, American plum, Skunkbush sumac and <br />Siberian elm. <br />Techniques suitable to enhance wildlife in Colorado are presented by Rutherford and Snyder <br />(1983), who reported that with respect to Mule Deer habitat in Colorado, the three most <br />important axioms are "1) Early stages of plant succession are more beneficial than climax <br />vegetation; 2) A mixture of plant communities provides better habitat than any single <br />community; and, 3) More browse is preferable to less browse." Among the "shrub, tree and vine <br />species for use consideration in Colorado" they recommend that Native plum and Skunkbush <br />sumac are "shrubs recommended for priority use in wildlife plantings." Among the woody plant <br />species recommended "Shrubs for supplement to taller species & for direct seeding" they <br />recommend Fourwing Saltbush and Rubber Rabbitbrush. With respect to Elk habitat they state <br />that "Opening up over mature oakbrush to stimulate new sprouting and to create stands of grass, <br />following the techniques of Kufeld (1977, 1978), will greatly enhance this habitat type for elk." <br />With respect to the pinyon - juniper type, they recommend that: <br />"mechanical control of pinyon - juniper, with followup seeding to establish grasses in the <br />openings, can be a highly effective means on suitable sites for making this vegetation <br />association more valuable as a producer of elk. The techniques (anchor, chaining, <br />cabling, and bulldozing) are quite standardized, and the concepts of limiting the treatment <br />to small blocks or strips are fully applicable." <br />EFCI submits that although the objectives of mining are somewhat different, the surface <br />disturbance caused by mining and the corresponding reclamation have resulted in a significant <br />improvement to mule deer and elk habitat and have almost exactly resulted in the duplications of <br />the habitat modifications recommended by the Division of Wildlife and has made this property <br />significantly better than it was prior to disturbance with respect to big game. <br />In probably the best compilation of literature ever prepared dealing with wildlife and range <br />habitat improvement, in the Intermountain Region, which included Colorado east wards to and <br />including the Rocky Mountain foothills, Monsen and others (2004) report that for the Mountain <br />Brush plant community (including the Oakbrush type) that many areas have been so altered by <br />grazing and the elimination of fire that the understory vegetation layer has been decreased to <br />such a point that there is often no longer any herbaceous understory. In many areas the clumps <br />have become so high that much of the vegetation is out of the reach of grazing animals or so <br />thick that the stands are impenetrable to livestock and wildlife. <br />At the Southfield Mine many areas of the Oakbrush type is so thick that during the vegetation <br />sampling effort, it was necessary in many instances to get to the transect starting point by <br />walking around trees or brush clumps to the desired transect commencement point and then lay <br />out the transect tape. While the transect tape was being laid out along the necessary compass <br />bearing, it was often necessary to throw the transect tape through trees or brush and to sample the <br />predetermined random intervals or to get around the really thick patches or vegetation. It was <br />also frequently necessary to get down on your hands and knees and literally crawl to the desired <br />sampled interval or break through the brush so thick that ones clothes were literally ripped off <br />