My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-04-29_REPORT - C1981038
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
2015-04-29_REPORT - C1981038
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:59:42 PM
Creation date
4/29/2015 10:51:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/29/2015
Doc Name
2011 Annual Hydrology , Mine Inflow and Susidence Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Bowie Resources, LLC
Annual Report Year
2011
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Name of Addressee <br />Page 4 <br />Date <br />following sites: SM -11 (one half), SM -10 (one half), SM -06 <br />(one half), SM -05 (one half), and MW -01 (one quarter). <br />It is noted that based on the 2011 AHR, the lab mistakenly <br />left Acidity off the parameters list for this site. <br />Based on the information presented in the 2011 AHR the <br />13. Prevention of <br />disturbance to the hydrologic balance within and adjacent to <br />material damage to the <br />CDRMS regulation <br />the permit area caused by mining and reclamation at the <br />hydrologic balance <br />4.05.1(1) <br />Bowie No. 1 Mine is the minimum that can be expected from <br />outside the permit area <br />an underground mining operation at this location. Use of <br />best management practices indicates minimization of <br />disturbance to the hydrologic balance. <br />Discussion of the PHC begins on page 125 of Section <br />2.05.6(3)(b)(iv) of permit C- 1981 -038 and is divided into four <br />sections; effects to surface water from mine facilities, effects <br />to groundwater from mine facilities, effects to groundwater <br />within the permit and adjacent areas, and effects to surface <br />water within the permit and adjacent areas. <br />14. Agreement of <br />Surface water— Monitoring data reported for springs and <br />observed hydrologic <br />CDRMS regulation <br />ponds was somewhat consistent with baseline data and the <br />impacts with "probable <br />2.05.6(3) and <br />predicted impacts identified in the PHC section on page 125 <br />hydrologic <br />requirement to keep <br />of Volume 1 of C- 1981 -038. <br />consequences" (PHC) <br />current CDR <br />projected in mining <br />regulation 2.03.3(1) <br />The water quality reported for a majority of surface water <br />sites fell within the baseline ranges. Higher than average <br />parameters were identified both at sites affected by mining <br />and those not affected by mining. See Table 2 below. <br />Ground water — No material damage has occurred, as <br />discussed in item 21, above. <br />15. Adequacy of <br />CDRMS regulation <br />The current ground water monitoring program continues to <br />ground water <br />4.05.13(1) <br />adequately address the protection of the hydrologic balance. <br />monitoring program <br />16. Adequacy of <br />CDRMS regulation <br />The current surface water monitoring program continues to <br />surface water <br />4.05.13(2) <br />adequately address the protection of the hydrologic balance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.