My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-04-22_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
2015-04-22_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:59:31 PM
Creation date
4/28/2015 3:28:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/22/2015
Doc Name
TR32 Response Plan
From
Battle Mountain Resources, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR32
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
analyses. The laboratory duplicate samples were performed to measure the precision of the <br />analytical method and the RPD was calculated using the following equation: <br />RPD = I (COncsample- COncDuplicate)I /((COncsample+ COncDuplicate) 12) * 100 <br />The RPD for TDS was less than four (4) percent for all analyses which meets the data objectives <br />for this program and no sample results were qualified based on laboratory duplicate QC results. <br />Table 3 shows the TDS laboratory duplicates analyzed during the Response Plan. <br />4.1.2 Cation and Anion Balancing <br />The sum of the cations and anions, expressed as milliequivalents per liter (meq/L), should be <br />balanced because all waters are electrochemically neutral. This percentage difference can be <br />calculated using the following equation: <br />% Difference = ( Sumcatio ns- SUMAnions ) /(Sumcations +SumAnions) * 100 <br />The calculated cation and anion balance from measured concentrations are shown in Table 4. The <br />acceptance criteria under this Response Plan for the percent difference of the cations and anions is <br />± 5%. Based upon this acceptance criteria the measured percent differences are generally <br />acceptable and indicate that the target analytes reflect the predominant constituents composing the <br />TDS in monitoring well M -14. <br />4.1.3 Calculated TDS <br />The correctness of the measured TDS value was verified by using the following formula: <br />TDS = 0.61 * Alkalinity (as CaCO3) + Na + K + Ca + Mg + Cl + SO4 + Si02 + NO3 + F <br />The measured TDS concentration would be higher than the calculated TDS if significant <br />contributors were not be included in the calculation. A generally accepted ratio of measured TDS <br />to calculated TDS should be less than 20 percent, otherwise the selected constituents for analysis <br />may not accurately reflect the measured TDS. <br />TR -32 M -14 TDS Response Plan Report AES, Inc. <br />Battle Mountain Resources — San Luis, CO 6 January 2015 (Update) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.