My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-04-13_REPORT - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2015-04-13_REPORT - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 2:58:37 PM
Creation date
4/14/2015 10:08:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/13/2015
From
DRMS
To
Bowie Resources, LLC
Annual Report Year
2013
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peabody Sage Creek Mining, LLC <br />Page 6 <br />0514/2014 <br />11. Basic Standards <br />A groundwater point of compliance was not established for <br />(Interim Narrative <br />CWQCC regulation <br />the Bowie No. 2 Mine based on existing groundwater quality <br />Standard) for Ground <br />41.5.C.6 <br />and use and a prediction in the Probable Hydrologic <br />Water <br />Consequences section of C- 1996 -083 that mining will not <br />likely have a negative effect on groundwater. <br />All parameters were met with the exceptions of the <br />12. Parameters to be <br />following discrepancies for the 2013 Water Year: <br />analyzed in ground <br />Table 2 of 2013 AHR <br />water samples <br />Table 161, Site AW -5: Manganese was not reported for <br />September. <br />Based on the information presented in the 2013 AHR the <br />13. Prevention of <br />disturbance to the hydrologic balance within and adjacent to <br />material damage to the <br />CDRMS regulation <br />the permit area caused by mining and reclamation at the <br />hydrologic balance <br />4.05.1(1) <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine is the minimum that can be expected from <br />outside the permit area <br />an underground mining operation at this location. Use of <br />best management practices indicates minimization of <br />disturbance to the hydrologic balance. <br />Surface water— Monitoring data reported for springs and <br />ponds was consistent with baseline data and the predicted <br />impacts identified in the PHC section on page 2.05 -115 of C- <br />1996 -083. Conductivity was above average at the majority <br />of the sites when compared to baseline data. <br />The water quality reported for a majority of surface water <br />14. Agreement of <br />CDR MS regulation <br />sites fell within the baseline ranges. Higher than average <br />observed hydrologic <br />2.05.6(3) and <br />parameters were identified both at sites affected by mining <br />impacts with "probable <br />requirement to keep <br />and those not affected by mining. See Table 3 below. <br />hydrologic <br />current, CDRMS <br />consequences" (PHC) <br />regulation 2.03.3(1) <br />Ground water— No material damage has occurred, as <br />projected in mining <br />discussed in item 21, above. However, ground water wells <br />DH -25, DH -38, DH -65, DH -67B, DH- 67blw, CWI- DH -58, CWI - <br />BH-60 and AW -4 were identified as being destroyed, <br />blocked, or otherwise inaccessible. As such, no data has <br />been collected from these sites. A determination of <br />compliance cannot be made due to a failure to collect and <br />submit the required data. <br />Wells DH -65, DH- 67blw, CWI- DH -60, CWI- DH -58, and AW -4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.