2015-04-01_PERMIT FILE - M2015011

Home Browse Search

Ralph Bell From: Ralph Bell Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:30 AM To: 'Russell - DNR, Elliott' Subject: RE: Rueb 111 Got it, we will keep pursuing them. Have you called Rueb complete yet? Ralph Bell Chief Executive Officer Castle Rock Construction Company of Colorado, LLC 6374 S. Racine Cl Centennial, CO 80111 303 - 974 -2601 direct 303 - 880 -1883 mobile From: Russell - DNR, Elliott [ maiIto :elliott.russell @state.co.us] Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:04 AM To: Ralph Bell Subject: Re: Rueb 111 Ralph, Rule 6.3.12 states: Where the mining operation will adversely affect the stability of any significant, valuable and permanent man- made structure located within two hundred (200) feet of the affected land, the Applicant may either: (a) provide a notarized agreement between the Applicant and the person(s) having an interest in the structure, that the Applicant is to provide compensation for any damage to the structure; (b) or where such an agreement cannot be reached, the Applicant shall provide an appropriate engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall not be damaged by activities occurring at the mining operation; (c) or where such structure is a utility, the Applicant may supply a notarized letter, on utility letterhead, from the owner(s) of the utility that the mining and reclamation activities, as proposed, will have "no negative effect" on their utility. The Division understands what is set forth in the letter provided by CDOT, but to comply with Rule 6.3.12 you will need to have signed and notarized letter meeting the requirements of subsections (a) or (c). When you can demonstrate that the attempts to get the agreement have been thoroughly exhausted, the Division will accept documentation for subsection (b). If this issue is not resolved before the adequacy review, it will be included in the formal adequacy review letter. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Ralph Bell <RBell(a,crccllc.com> wrote: