My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-03-23_REPORT - C1994082
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2015-03-23_REPORT - C1994082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 10:16:09 AM
Creation date
3/27/2015 12:23:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/23/2015
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2014
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JHB
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Springs <br />- Spoil Spring 1 (YSSPGI). This spoil spring was discovered in <br />September 2002. It is located just above the old haul road culvert <br />crossing Annand Draw. Its TDS plot displays a decreasing trend. <br />- Spoil Spring 2 (YSSPG2). This spoil spring was discovered in May 2005 <br />below Stock Pond 011A (i.e., above NPDES Pond 011) . It is normally dry <br />in the fall. Its TDS plot displayed a recently decreasing trend. <br />- Spoil Spring 3 (YSSPG3). This spoil spring was discovered in <br />September 2005 above NPDES Pond 012. Its TDS plot displays an increasing <br />trend. <br />- Spoil Spring 4 (YSSPG4) This spoil spring was discovered in June <br />2006, in the main channel that feeds NPDES Pond 012. It is located to <br />the north of Spoil Spring 3. Its TDS plot displays a decreasing trend. <br />- Spoil Spring 5 (YSSPG5). This spring was discovered in July 2011, in <br />the main channel that feeds NPDES Pond 014. Its TDS value then, 2590 <br />mg /1, indicated that there may be spoil water in this spring. However, <br />the TDS values from Pond 014 in 2011 (680 min., 1233 avg., 1640 max.) <br />indicates that there was very little, if any, spoil water in this pond. <br />No flow was noted in 2012, 2013, or 2014. <br />Comparison of Surface Water Quality to Water Use Standards. SCC has <br />compiled a list of surface water standards for agricultural uses (Table <br />11). This list is composed of CDPHE surface water agricultural use <br />standards (CDPHE, Reg.31, November 2009). <br />Table 12 provides a comparison of surface water quality (including <br />springs) to agricultural standards. This Paradox database generated <br />table does not include the units of concentration (mg /l or ug /1) for <br />each parameter. The units used for each parameter are the same as those <br />listed on the standards table (Table 11) and are also the same as those <br />used in the water quality reports. The frequency column on Table 12 <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.