My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-03-20_INSPECTION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2015-03-20_INSPECTION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:58:33 PM
Creation date
3/20/2015 2:45:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
3/20/2015
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company
Inspection Date
3/11/2015
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M -1980 -244 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: TC1 <br />INSPECTION DATE: March 11, 2015 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The Division conducted a monitoring inspection of the site on March 11, 2015. Marc Tidquist, represented the <br />Operator during various parts of the inspection. Tim Cazier and Travis Marshall represented the Division. The <br />focus of this inspection was to observe water levels, and initiate some discussion on numeric protection limits <br />(NPLs), the new Squaw Gulch Valley Leach Facility (SGVLF) pump back system and reported slope instability in <br />the Wildhorse Extension pit (WHEX). <br />On Site Meetings: <br />Meeting I: Mr. Tidquist explained additional area is needed for the blast stemming material crushing <br />operation. The current location on the West Blue Overburden Storage Area (WBOSSA) has proven to have <br />insufficient space for the 250,000 tons required. The mine plans to use the area in the South Cresson pit as a <br />temporary location to crush and store an additional 200,000 tons of material. <br />Due to the early January 2015 80% storage capacity exceedance in the Phase I PSSA, the Division is reviewing <br />the need for monitoring the water levels in the PSSAs outside the influence of the cones of depression <br />resulting from PSSA pumping. As there are PSSA water level transducers in the AGVLF Phase I, II and IV <br />facilities, PSSA static water level monitoring in AGVLF Phase V and the new SGVLF were discussed. The <br />Division understands that additional storage capacity is built into the AGVLF system, should the Phase V PSSA <br />exceed 100% storage capacity in that overflow from the Phase V PSSA would be captured in the Phase I PSSA, <br />and overflow from the Phase I PSSA would be captured by the Phase II PSSA. Currently there are no plans to <br />install water level transducers in either the AGVLF Phase V or the SGVLF PSSA facilities. The Division will <br />consider the need for each and inform CC &V of its decision. <br />Meeting II: Mr. Lawrence Myers (CC &V) met with Mr. Marshall to discuss groundwater monitoring and <br />Numeric Protection Levels (NPLs) as part of the Division's review of the background of both. The discussion <br />focused on the furthest down gradient monitoring wells in Arequa Gulch (CRMW5A, B, C, & D). Mr. Myers <br />indicated that these wells are not considered the point of compliance and that the wells are located outside of <br />the permit boundary. The Division has no data for these wells due to it being located outside of the permit <br />boundary and as such, Mr. Myers stated DRMS has no jurisdictional authority to request such data. The <br />Division is currently reviewing the history related to the Arequa Gulch monitoring program. Mr. Myers also <br />informed the Division that the NPL's for the wells acting as the point of compliance (CRMW -3A and CRMW -3B) <br />was set and approved in Amendment 6. <br />Meeting III: The Division met with CC &V Projects personnel to discuss the detailed designs for the SGVLF <br />pumpback system which will pump water from the underdrain system back into the mine circuit. Mr. Ron <br />Roberts (CC &V Projects Manager) and Andrea Meduna (Amec engineer) explained the concrete pumpback <br />ponds will now act as overflow storage for the underdrain sump as opposed to acting as the sump itself. The <br />Division expressed concerns about the monitoring program for the concrete ponds and the pressure rating for <br />the pumpback system pipe, given the high static head required to pump the collected water back up to the <br />SGVLF PSSA from the toe of the Hwy 67 realignment embankment. Ms. Meduna stated the proposed <br />geosynthetic liner for the concrete ponds can accommodate significant elongation, allowing for seepage <br />protection should the concrete crack. CC &V agreed to address these issues in a Technical Revision for the <br />SGVLF pumpback system. CC &V also confirmed As- Constructed drawings of the pumpback system would be <br />included in the next SGVLF CQA certification report. As- Constructed drawings of the pumpback system <br />concrete ponds were submitted to the Division in January 2015 as part of the SGVLF PSSA CQA certification <br />report. <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.