My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-03-11_REPORT - M1974004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1974004
>
2015-03-11_REPORT - M1974004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:58:12 PM
Creation date
3/18/2015 9:48:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1974004
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/11/2015
Doc Name
Annual Report Fee Map
From
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Martin Marietta Materials <br />Spec -Agg 2015 Annual Report <br />1) Representative discontinuity orientations (dip and dip direction) from data collected during the <br />2014 site visits (Table 1). <br />2) Mine Slope Orientations (dip and dip direction) as presented in Table 2 and shown in Figure <br />2. A total of thirteen (13) slope orientations were considered. <br />3) Estimated Rock Mass Discontinuity Interface Friction Angle. A typical interface friction angle <br />of 33 degrees was considered in all cases for the kinematic analysis, as discussed in Section <br />6.3. <br />The kinematic analysis stereonet plots are presented in Figures 8 through 15. Representative <br />discontinuity orientations are shown as green lines. The slope orientation for the considered wall is <br />shown as a blue line. The friction circle is shown as a black line. Each kinematic analysis plot is <br />evaluated based on where discontinuities plot in relation to the "critical zone ", which is shown as a light <br />red shaded area on the stereonet plots. <br />6.4.1 Potential Failure Modes <br />6.4.1.1 Planar Failure <br />Planar failure is indicated as a potential failure mode if the dip vector of a discontinuity falls between the <br />dip direction of the slope face and the friction cone representing the assumed discontinuity interface <br />friction angle. The following four conditions, defined by Hoek & Bray (1977), must be met in order for <br />planar failure to occur: <br />1) The plane on which sliding occurs must strike parallel or nearly parallel to the slope face. <br />Typically, discontinuity planes with a dip direction within 30 degrees of the slope dip direction are <br />considered. <br />2) The failure plane must "daylight' in the slope face (i.e., the dip of the failure plane must be smaller <br />than the dip of the slope face). <br />3) The dip of the failure plane must be greater than the angle of friction of the plane. <br />4) Release surfaces, which provide negligible resistance to sliding, must be present in the rock <br />mass to define the lateral boundaries of the slide. <br />On the stereonets, criteria for planar sliding are satisfied when the dip vector of a discontinuity plots within <br />the critical zone, shown as shaded regions in Figures 8 through 15. The limits of the critical zone are <br />defined by the area of overlap between the friction circle and the great circle representing the plane of the <br />slope face. <br />6.4.1.2 Wedge Failure <br />Wedge failure is characterized by sliding that occurs along the line of intersection of two discontinuities <br />(Hoek & Bray, 1977). <br />According to the analysis method developed by Markland (1972), a wedge failure can occur when the <br />following criteria are satisfied: <br />1) The plunge of the lines of intersection is less than the dip of the slope face. <br />2) The plunge of the lines of intersection exceeds the angle of friction. <br />February 25, 2015 Page 11 Lachel & Associates, Inc. <br />Project 14364006 00 02015 All Rights Reserved <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.