My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-20_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2015-02-20_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2016 9:47:07 AM
Creation date
3/4/2015 1:24:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/20/2015
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2 Permits -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />grouped as mature individuals (DBH greater than 2 inches), saplings (DBH less than 2 inches) and <br />standing dead (snags). <br />Sample Adequacy -Adequacy of sampling was determined periodically during field sampling utilizing <br />the following equation from Snedecor and Cochran (1967). <br />nmm = tzsZ / (dx)z <br />where: n,n;° =the minimum number of observations needed <br />t =the distribution value at a given confidence level (CL); i.e. 1.64 (90% CL) For <br />grassland communities and 1.282 (80% CL) for shrubland communities <br />sZ =the sample variance <br />d2 = 10% level of accuracy, or 0.1 <br />x =the sample mean <br />An adequate sample for each pazameter (cover and production) was determined in each vegetation type <br />by exceeding the n~ requirement obtained from the equation with a minimum of 15 samples. <br />Data Analyses -Cover data were summarized by determining the mean percent cover, relative percent <br />cover, and standard deviation for each species, lifeform group, rock, litter, and baze ground within each <br />vegetation type sampled. Above ground standing biomass of species (production) was determined as the <br />mean dry weight of all species in all plots within each vegetation type sampled. Production was <br />• expressed in grams per square meter and pounds per acre for each type. Shrub density was computed as <br />the mean number of plants per 50 square meters and the mean number of plants per 0.1 acre for all <br />species. Tree density was computed as the mean number of plants per 100 square meters and the mean <br />number of plants per 0.1 acre for all species. Species diversity was computed as the mean number of <br />different species encountered by vegetation hits along the 50-meter cover transect. <br />Statistical Equivalency of Reference Areas -The statistical equivalency of each reference area with the <br />study area was determined for vegetation cover, production and species density in each vegetation type <br />according to the following equation (OSM 1980): <br />(z,-x,)<or>t (s2l/n,)+(s2~/n2) <br />Where: x =sample mean <br />sZ =sample variance <br />t = t table value for 90% confidence level <br />n =sample size <br />Livestock Carrie Capacity -Livestock carrying capacity of each vegetation type was determined by <br />considering the nutritional requirements of cattle and sheep (Stoddart et al, 1975) according to the, <br />following assumptions. A cow and calf (cattle animal unit) consumes 900 pounds of av-dry forage per <br />month and a ewe and lamb (sheep animal unit) consumes 150 pounds of air-dry forage per month. The <br />conversion of oven dry weight to air-dry weight is 1.11. The ideal utilization factor for forage grazing is <br />50 percent. The livestock carrying capacity was determined by the Following: <br />. LCC=(1.11xFAx.S)/FC <br />where: LCC =Livestock Carrying Capacity (RUM per acre) <br />South Taylor/Lower Wilson-Rule 2, Page 63 Revision Date: 1/31/07 <br />Revision No.: PR-02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.