My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-26_REPORT - C1981028 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2015-02-26_REPORT - C1981028 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 10:35:21 AM
Creation date
2/26/2015 12:52:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/26/2015
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology and Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2014
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
TNL
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Keenesburg Mine 2014 Vegetation Monitoring Report <br />46 %), the decrease in cool season grasses was much larger (19% to 3.8 %). This suggests that the <br />same decline in cool season species is likely occurring in this area as well. The seed mixture used <br />in Area 31 was slightly different from that used in Area 30 and favored warm season grasses <br />91% to 9 %. <br />Table 9: Reclamation Area 13 Relative Cover Trends 2012 — 2014 <br />Life Form <br />Relative over M <br />2012 <br />2014 <br />Cool Season Perennial Grasses <br />19.0 <br />3.8 <br />Warm Season Perennial Grasses <br />58.2 <br />46.2 <br />Cheat grass <br />18.4 <br />24.5 <br />Annual Introduced Forbs <br />0.6 <br />8.0 <br />6.2 Herbaceous Production <br />Based on the results of the herbaceous production sampling, Reclamation Areas 30 and 31 both <br />fell short of the production success standard calculated value (Table 10). <br />Table 10: Herbaceous Production Success Standard Comparison <br />Herbaceous Production <br />( M2) <br />Reclamation <br />Area 30 <br />Reclamation <br />Area 31 <br />Mean <br />120.0 <br />101.6 <br />Mean (minus noxious) <br />114.9 <br />97.7 <br />St Dev <br />101.4 <br />65.0 <br />N <br />15 <br />15 <br />Nmin <br />141 <br />80 <br />Standard <br />212.6 <br />90% of Standard <br />191.3 <br />Standard Passed? <br />No <br />No <br />Herbaceous production was approximately the same in 2014 as it was in 2012 in Reclamation <br />Area 30 (120 g /m2 as compared to 124.1 g /m2). However, in 2012 it was almost entirely <br />composed of perennial grasses with a small component of cheatgrass. In 2014, it was only 42% <br />perennial grasses with a 5% component of annual grasses (4% cheatgrass), 29% native forbs, and <br />24% introduced forbs. <br />Reclamation Area 31 had greater herbaceous production in 2014 than 2012 (101.64 g /m2 <br />compared to 77.5 g /0). However, the community components changed at this site as well. In <br />2012 there were 92% perennial grasses, 5% cheatgrass, and 3% forbs, while in 2014 there were <br />57% perennial grasses, 5% annual grasses (4% cheatgrass), 25% native fortis, and 14% <br />introduced forbs. <br />The above average precipitation in 2013 -2014 resulted in a large increase to the predicted <br />standard value, but not a large increase in actual production on the ground. This could be due to <br />the timing of the precipitation. The extra precipitation fell a huge storm event in September <br />2013, above average snowfall in January, and large events in May and June 2014. The <br />September 2013 precipitation fell so fast that it caused flooding in much of the state and did not <br />Habitat Management, Inc. 15 September 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.