My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-26_REPORT - C1982056 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2015-02-26_REPORT - C1982056 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:57:45 PM
Creation date
2/26/2015 10:50:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/26/2015
Doc Name
Foidel Subsidence Evaluation Part 3(Final)
From
DRMS
To
Nicole Caveny
Type & Sequence
PR10
Permit Index Doc Type
Subsidence Report
Email Name
JLE
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Task 4: Engineering and Design: The scope of <br />work for Task 4 included an engineering interpreta- <br />tion of the hazard map, boulder catalog and CRSP <br />output and development and modeling of alternative <br />mitigation techniques. <br />2. SITE INVESTIGATION AND DESIGN <br />PARAMETER SELECTION <br />The objectives of this work were to provide data on <br />slope morphology, surface characteristics and block - <br />size frequency- distribution. Specific tasks, which <br />were carved out concurrently, included; <br />mapping of slope morphology and surface <br />characteristics, including slope breaks, soil <br />and vegetation type, and man -made features. <br />compilation of a boulder catalog containing <br />details of blocks from earlier falls including <br />location, approximate dimensions, source <br />area (if determinable), and failure mode (as <br />determinable). <br />scanline mapping to assess the spacing of the <br />various discontinuity sets present. <br />2.1 Slope Morphology <br />During the site investigation, morphological features <br />were recorded by SubTerra personnel to supplement <br />Twentymile Coal Company's ] -inch to 200 -feet <br />topographical maps and to aid in developing CRSP3 <br />model parameters. Features of interest included <br />upper and lower slope breaks, cliff base and crest <br />lines, and man -made features such as leveled areas, <br />drainage ditches, and CAT roads. <br />The general distribution of the surficial materials <br />appeared to be related to the slope breaks, however, <br />they were mapped only in sufficient detail to enable <br />appropriate rebound parameters to be assigned in the <br />CRSP3 models. These surficial materials consisted <br />predominantly of talus and colluvium. Talus <br />appeared to be restricted to the upper part of the <br />slope, and included some buried or partially buried <br />material. The colluvium is considered to be a <br />widespread deposit consisting mainly of fine sand or <br />silty fine sand with a variable amount of sandstone <br />pebbles, cobbles, and boulders, In areas where the <br />marine shale horizon is close to the surface, the <br />colluvial matrix contained a higher proportion of silt <br />and clay sized material. <br />2.2 Structural Reghims And Boulder Characteristics <br />The Twentymile sandstone outcrop had a massive, <br />unjointed appearance for significant lengths. <br />However, the earlier cliff failures, in response to <br />undermining by Panel 6, confirmed that significant <br />jointing was, in fact, present. This jointing resulted <br />in the formation of a variety of block sizes, some of <br />which were very large. Closer inspection revealed <br />that jointing was present in the outcrop, although <br />weathering or surface patina tended to obscure these <br />features in many areas. <br />2.2.1 Scanline Survey <br />Although the intent was to base the design block size <br />primarily on the boulder catalog, it was deemed <br />necessary to make an estimate of the block size <br />distribution based on jointing in the cliff face to <br />ensure that the boulder catalog was representative of <br />the size of boulders likely to be encountered. <br />Conventional scanline surveys were precluded by <br />the irregular nature of the topography at the base of <br />the cliff and the relatively wide joint spacing. In <br />view of these limitations, the approach adopted was <br />simply to walk sections of the cliff and assign each <br />joint encountered to one of four previously mapped <br />joint sets. In the case of S2 (bedding plane) joints, <br />absolute spacings were estimated in a number of <br />cliff sections and the results combined to obtain <br />spacing frequency distribution directly. For all other <br />joint sets, mean apparent spacings were estimated to <br />provide an indirect estimate of frequency distribu- <br />tion. Four scanlines, with a total length of 2,000 feet <br />were recorded in Zones 2, 3/4, 617, and 8/9. <br />2.2.2 Boulder Surrey <br />Boulder dimensions were measured in the direction <br />of the slope, normal to the slope and across the <br />slope, respectively. The upper part of the cliff face <br />had numerous rounded exfoliated blocks, many of <br />which were detached or partially detached from the <br />substrate. These exfoliated blocks were probably the <br />source of many of the smaller blocks located on the <br />slopes below. Source area elevations were estimated <br />from the topographical maps. <br />2.2.3 Block Size <br />The general approach to design block -size selection <br />was to review the data on historical rockfall events <br />summarized in the boulder catalog, and to compare <br />this to the block sizes estimated from the scanline <br />data. <br />The scanline data included estimated absolute <br />spacing for bedding plane discontinuity (S2) and <br />apparent mean spacing for S ] , S3 and S4. Minor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.