Laserfiche WebLink
Panel <br />Ribside <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Vertical Stress I <br />Re -distribution 1 <br />/ 1 <br />f <br />Panel <br />Yield <br />Pillar <br />"Rigid' or <br />Abtatment <br />Pillar <br />(a) After Development <br />Figure I <br />Generalized Vertical Stress Change and <br />Displacement during Longwall Mining <br />(Derived using information from Mark, 1992. <br />Bienawski, 1992, Shadbolt. 1977) <br />Pillar Yeid and Floor <br />Punching <br />(load transier to cure) <br />so 3 <br />e <br />100 <br />Floor Heave <br />(b) After Longwall Extraction <br />1. Empirical Methods: Graphical Methods, Profile <br />Functions, Influence Functions and Zone Area <br />Methods. <br />2. Analytical Methods: Mechanistic Models, Finite <br />Element, Boundary Element, and Hybrids. <br />Panel <br />Extension Compression <br />�® I <br />®I <br />I <br />I <br />Zone of Vertical Extension I <br />(bed separation) I <br />I <br />I <br />Q Zone of Bed Separation II ✓ �� <br />Zone of Caving <br />I r ®® <br />2 <br />If "p O <br />— — 1 3-5m <br />Zone of Incomplete <br />Convergence <br />(c) Zones of Fracturing <br />(Singh, 1986) <br />EXPLANATION: <br />M = Extracted seam thickness <br />S = Subsidence <br />av = In -situ weNcat stress <br />Or = Side abutment stress <br />+E = Extension <br />•E = Compression <br />Table 1 provides a summary of the relative <br />capability of each method with regard to the <br />prediction of subsidence, displacement, and strain. <br />The interested reader is referred to the citations for a <br />detailed description of each method. <br />Table 1. Relative capability of the methods to predict subsidence, displacement and strain. <br />PREDICTION METHOD METHOD OF PREDICTING <br />(REFERENCE) Subsidence (S) Displacement Strain (E) <br />Graphical Method Graphical based on w/h & Not predicted, however, Figure Maximum strains predicted <br />(Ref: NCB, 1975) tabulated profile data 64 provides a monogram for using Smax/h multiplier. Strain <br />calculating the change in length profile predicted using tabulated <br />of a subsided surface structure. & araphical data. <br />Profile Functions <br />Uses mathematical equation <br />Calculated from predicted <br />Calculated from predicted <br />(Karmis, 1992; Singh, 1992) <br />based on empirical data. <br />slope. <br />curvature <br />Zone Area Method <br />Subsidence factor calculated by <br />Calculated from predicted <br />Calculated from predicted <br />(Karmis & Hacocks, 1983; <br />superposition of the proportional <br />slope. <br />curvature. <br />Marr, 1975) <br />extraction of a finite number of <br />concentric rings forming the area <br />of influence. <br />Influence Functions Profiles constructed by Calculated from predicted Calculated from predicted <br />(VPI, 1987; Salamon, 1992) integrating the influence function slope. curvature. <br />(see eq. 3 -7 to 3 -11) <br />Mechanistic Models Subsidence predicted based on Not addressed. Not addressed. <br />composite beam deflections. <br />Finite & Boundary Element Subsidence & related parameters Produced as model output. Computed from modeled <br />Models simulated directly through displacements. <br />(Su, 1992; Summers, 1990) analysis of the rock mass <br />response to undermining. <br />