My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-26_REVISION - C1982056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2015-02-26_REVISION - C1982056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:57:46 PM
Creation date
2/26/2015 9:50:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/26/2015
Doc Name
Review Assistance Request
From
Jared Ebert
To
Dan Hernandez
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
DIH
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stream Standards Comparisons <br />The State of Colorado stream standards applicable for the study area consist of: <br />• Segment 13a: Trout Creek and tributaries excluding Segments 13b and 13c not within a National <br />Forest <br />• Segment 13b: Foidel Creek and all tributaries, Fish Creeks and Middle Creeks and all tributaries <br />from County Road 27 to confluence with Trout Creek <br />• Segment 13c: Trout Creek from headgate of Spruce Hill Ditch to confluence with Fish Creek and <br />Tributaries to Trout Creek for County Road 27 to County Road 179 <br />• Segment 2: Yampa River, mainstem <br />The segments have the similar water quality standards, except that Segment 13a includes drinking water <br />standards for active water supply uses, Segment 13b does not include drinking water standards and Segment 13c <br />includes drinking water standards from June through February. The effect of these segment standards is that the <br />sulfate standard is not applicable to the mine discharge impacted reaches of Foidel, Fish, Middle and Trout <br />Creeks year - round. The relevant stream segments are shown on Exhibit 50, Figure E50 -4). <br />In this section, comparisons of ambient water quality conditions are made with applicable standards for selected <br />trace metals and inorganic chemical constituents. For a number of constituents, ambient concentrations were <br />found to frequently exceed the associated stream standard (Table 14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality <br />Modeling Analyses of Surface -Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin). This incompatibility between <br />standards and ambient conditions supported results of a similar baseline survey throughout the Yampa River <br />Basin (Wentz and Steele, 1980). The purpose of this comparison is to indicate that exceedances of certain <br />stream standards occur even before considering the impacts of additional mine flows. The several types of data <br />available for this analysis are provided in Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water <br />Resources of the Trout Creek Basin. <br />The average and ranges of concentrations for several trace metals of interest in this comparison of ambient <br />conditions with State of Colorado stream standards are summarized in Table 14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and <br />Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin. In the cases of other trace <br />metals, ambient levels exceeded standards for boron, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc concentrations <br />(Table 14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water Resources of the Trout <br />Creek Basin). Past monitoring indicated that the mine discharges did not have significant amount of boron. <br />Therefore, boron monitoring was discontinued. The mine discharges are monitored for manganese and iron. <br />Only occasional exceedances have occurred (a total of 18 in 1997 and 1998). In addition, no exceedances of the <br />manganese or iron in- stream standards attributable to the mining operations have been observed (Annual <br />Hydrologic Reports). <br />In the case of chloride, available data indicated average ambient concentrations consistently less than 20 mg/l, <br />compared to a stream standard of 250 mg /1 (Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface <br />Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin). For sulfate, ambient conditions exceeded the State of Colorado <br />stream standard of 250 mg/1 at the following four monitoring sites (Table 14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and <br />Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin) for site locations: <br />Site 39, Foidel Creek Tributary, 295 mg /1 <br />Site 14, Foidel Creek, 276 mg /1 <br />Site 8/2005, Foidel Creek, 814 mg /1 <br />Site 29, Middle Creek, 360 mg /l <br />In addition, sulfate exceeded stream standards from October 1980 to December 1983 21 percent of the time. <br />This is the period of record before mining commenced in 1984 at the Foidel Creek underground mine. <br />Moreover, reported ranges indicate standard exceedances by ambient sulfate concentrations in Fish Creek (Table <br />14 of Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water Resources of the Trout Creek <br />TR13 -83 2.05 -157 11/03/14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.