My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-26_REVISION - C1982056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2015-02-26_REVISION - C1982056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:57:46 PM
Creation date
2/26/2015 9:50:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/26/2015
Doc Name
Review Assistance Request
From
Jared Ebert
To
Dan Hernandez
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
DIH
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A series of studies perfonned in the Appalachian bituminous coal region confirmed the experience from <br />overseas. A study of subsidence in the Dunkard Basin (Owili- lager, 1982) concluded that water levels in units, <br />located within 330 feet above the rained coal, recovered after mining, and that there was no lasting deterioration <br />of ground water quality. Another study of subsidence in Western Pennsylvania (Hill and Price, 1983) concluded <br />that with an average thickness of the overburden of 550 feet, the shallow unit system was isolated from major <br />impact caused by mining. Authors also observed that after longwall mining underneath wells, the subsidence <br />slows and the strata settle and ground water levels rebound as flow paths to the mine become less direct. Stoner <br />(1983) performed a study of subsidence due to mining in the Pittsburgh seam in Greene County in southwestern <br />Pennsylvania. During his study, he monitored a well located above a longwall panel. The water level in the <br />monitored well declined during undermining, but returned within 3 feet of the premining level when mining <br />advanced beyond the well. <br />The tT.S. Bureau of Mimes (Walker, 1988) monitored surface subsidence and water level fluctuations in 10 <br />shallow observation wells above a series of four adjacent longwall panels in southern Pennsylvania for about 4 <br />years. Results of this study indicate that wells are generally unaffected by mining of a preceding panel. The <br />most important conclusion of this study was that nine out of ten wells investigated recovered to their pre- - mining <br />water level after raining was completed. <br />Similar observations were made during several studies of longwall mine subsidence impacts on hydrology in <br />Ohio and West Virginia completed by llydro -Geo Consultants, Inc. (1988 and 1991). In these studies, <br />monitoring of water levels and water quality before, during, and after undermining by longwall operation <br />indicated that impacts due to undermining were noticeable only in wells or surface water bodies within <br />approximately 200 feet of the mined coal. Typically, in wells installed within Zones 2 and 3, water levels <br />declined during undermining and returned to levels somewhat lower than pre - mining. An explanation of the <br />slight decline of the water table after longwall mining was presented in studies where the permeability of the <br />water - bearing strata was measured before and after mining. <br />A study of subsidence effects due to longwall mining on hydrology in Marshal County, West Virginia was <br />published by the U.S. Geological Survey (Schultz, 1988). In this study, ten observation wells underlain by <br />longwall panels were monitored before and after mining. Three of the wells were tested for transmissivity <br />before and after mining. It was found that transmissivity increased substantially after mining in two out of the <br />three wells. The study also concluded that changes in water levels prior to and after mining exceeded ten feet in <br />only two of the ten monitored wells. <br />The potential for water levels to decrease after mining is completed, typically results from increasing <br />permeability of the water- bearing strata. The decrease of water level in most wells is compensated for by an <br />increased well yield. Therefore, the slight decrease of water levels after mining in some wells does not <br />materially affect postinining water availability. An extensive study of ground water inflow into longwall coal <br />panels and of changes of hydraulic conductivities induced by longwall mining was conducted by researchers at <br />the 1Jniversity of Nottingham in England (Singh, 1986; Singh, Hibberd, and Fawcett, 1986; and Whittaker, <br />Singh, and Neate, 1979). Conclusions of their studies are summarized in the following points: <br />The main zone of appreciable change of in -situ permeability was found to lie between the face of the <br />longwall operation and 40 meters (131.2 feet) behind the face: Appreciable in -situ permeability change <br />was observed to occur up to 40 meters (131.2 feet) above the extraction zone; and changes in ground <br />water flow properties of the strata were found to be of stepped characteristics ; this was thought to be due <br />to opening and closing of fractures and separations. <br />Studying effects of longwall mining in Japan, Nakajina (1976) found that just after raining at the Kushiro Mine, <br />the ratio of vacant space to vertical height in the caved roof was about 30 percent. Data gathered from boreholes <br />in the gob 2 years after mining, indicated that this ratio had dropped to an average of 6.2 percent. This indicates <br />that much reconsolidating had taken place, and that permeability was greatly reduced over the 2 -year period. <br />Conclusions from the referenced studies of the impacts of subsidence above a longwall coal raining operation on <br />hydrology can be summarized as follows: <br />TR13 -83 2.05 -147 11/03/14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.