My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-17_HYDROLOGY - M1977348
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977348
>
2015-02-17_HYDROLOGY - M1977348
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:57:29 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 10:16:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977348
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
2/17/2015
Doc Name
Technical Memorandum
From
Golder Associates
To
DRMS
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Colorado Division of Mining Reclamation and Safety February 17, 2015 <br />Eric Scott 5 1400159 <br />Tritium concentrations in the atmosphere peaked in 1963 (Clark and Fritz, 1997). Since 1963, tritium <br />concentrations in precipitation have decreased because of the discontinuation of weapons testing, <br />exchange of water with the oceans, and the short half -life of tritium. Clark and Fritz (1997) presented a <br />qualitative interpretation of tritium levels for continental regions (Table 1) as of 1997. <br />Table 1: Typical Tritium Concentrations in Groundwater <br />Tritium Concentration <br />Qualitative Assessment <br />< 0.8 TU <br />Sub modern- recharged prior to 1952 <br />0.8 to —4 TU <br />Mixture between sub modern and recent ages <br />5 to 15 TU <br />Modern < 5 to 10 ears <br />15 to 30 TU <br />Some bomb 3H present <br />> 30 TU <br />Lar e constituent of recharge from 1960s or 1970s <br />> 50 TU <br />Mainly 1960's recharge <br />Source: Clark and Fritz (IYYf) <br />The tritium value for modern (or current) precipitation and recharge is affected by many factors. The <br />factors include time, costal proximity, seasonal variation and latitude. The time has affected levels of <br />tritium in precipitation due to isotope decay and exchange of waters within the hydrologic cycle. The <br />exchange of waters is more prevalent in coastal regions, so the levels of tritium in precipitation are lower <br />near the oceans. Tritium concentrations in precipitation typically have strong seasonal variations; <br />therefore, estimates of tritium in precipitation typically are not based on any one storm event but are often <br />aggregate -based to account for seasonal and individual storm variation, all of which would contribute to <br />groundwater. <br />Additionally, tritium in precipitation varies with latitude and is generally greater at higher latitudes. This <br />relationship is demonstrated in Figure 3 which presents the Albuquerque (--350 N) data alongside historic <br />data from Denver (--400 N) and more recent data from Tucson, Arizona (--320 N). The seasonal aggregate <br />samples collected between 2008 and 2012 near Tucson, Arizona ranged from 3.0 and 8.1 TU (University <br />of Arizona, 2015). Due to the latitudinal relationship, tritium levels in precipitation at the Site (--400 N) are <br />likely closer to the upper end of these values, if not higher. Additional data for tritium levels in precipitation <br />near the Site is provided in Cowie et al. (2014), in which 21 precipitation samples were collected in the <br />San Juan Mountains of Colorado between January 2010 to October 2011 with a reported mean value of <br />6.2 TU. <br />' Golder <br />is \14 \1400159 \0100 \0 1 2 \t m- boettchedimestone uar rynl- 17feb15 \1400159 tm- boettcherlimestone ua F ry_ fnl- 17feb15.docx GlAssociates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.