Laserfiche WebLink
George V. Patterson, Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />Page 6 <br />February 12, 2015 <br />a) Groundwater Monitoring <br />The approved groundwater monitoring plan at the Southfield Mine is designed to monitor only <br />water within the interval disturbed by the mine, which is reasonable given the preceding discussion <br />of the hydrogeologic context at the site. No groundwater points of compliance have been <br />established at the Southfield Mine. Firstly, it was not determined that there was potential for the <br />mining operation to negatively impact the quality of groundwater for which quality standards had <br />been established by the Water Quality Control Commission. Secondly, given the preceding <br />discussion regarding the isolation of potential groundwater impacts to the coal seam and flooded <br />mine workings, combined with the fact that the in -situ quality of this water is known to be <br />degraded; points of compliance were deemed unnecessary. This matter is fully discussed in the June <br />2013 Memo. <br />The approved water monitoring program is described in Exhibit 25 of the PAP. Two parts of the <br />program relate to groundwater. The first of these is semi - annual sampling of four monitoring sites <br />(MW 16, MW23, MW65 and MWNW, shown in figure 2) to determine the water level and the <br />concentrations of a suite of suggested water quality parameters. The operator has been out of <br />compliance with this part of the monitoring plan for several years since MWN W is blocked (this is <br />the subject of the outstanding Notice of Violation CV- 2013 -002). <br />The second part of the monitoring plan relating to groundwater was discontinued in December, <br />2000, with mine closure. It required that points of inflow within the active workings be surveyed <br />semi - annually to estimate quantity, measure field parameters of water quality (pH, conductivity <br />and temperature), locate the inflows on a map, and document the data in the Annual Hydrology <br />Report (AHR). The operator estimated the quantity of water flowing into the mine based on <br />observations made at inflow and seep locations within the open part of the mine. Prior to 1994 the <br />metered discharge at the surface from the North Dewatering Well (now, MWN W) was factored in <br />to the estimate. After 1994 water was pumped to low spots within the mine workings, rather than <br />being discharged; it is understood that this pumping data was used in the estimate also. The <br />estimated mine inflows are summarized in Table 1. <br />Table 1: Summary of Estimated Mine Inflows (data copied from Annual Hydrology Reports) <br />Monitoring Year <br />Estimated Inflow (Acre -feet) <br />2000 <br />10.3* <br />1999 <br />15.2** <br />1998 <br />9.7** <br />1996 -1997 <br />39.6 <br />1995 -1996 <br />[Unable to locate AHR] <br />1994 -95 <br />49.9 <br />1985 -1994 <br />64.1 avg. (per 1994 AHR) <br />*The 1North/2 North area was inaccessible during 2000. It should be noted that during 1997 this area made up 86% of the <br />reported mine inflow <br />* *No inflow was observed in the 1North/2 North area <br />