My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-12_REVISION - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2015-02-12_REVISION - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:57:27 PM
Creation date
2/12/2015 10:15:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/12/2015
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc
Type & Sequence
TR43
Email Name
LDS
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
George V. Patterson, Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />Page 3 <br />February 12, 2015 <br />1) Groundwater <br />It was established during the original permitting of the Southfield mine that groundwater resources at <br />the site could be categorized as either: <br />• Alluvial /colluvial terrace deposits <br />• Laterally discontinuous perched aquifers <br />• Flooded mine workings <br />• Trinidad Sandstone regional aquifer <br />On page 2.05.640 of the Permit Application Package (PAP), in the PHC section, the possible <br />hydrologic connection of these potential groundwater resources with the mine workings is discussed. <br />It is stated that low permeability strata in the intervals between the mine workings and the Rex <br />Carbon coal seam above, and the Trinidad Sandstone below, provide effective hydrologic barriers <br />(see figure 1). As part of the TR43 review, the Division analyzed geologic data from the drill logs in <br />Exhibit 8 of the PAP and constructed detailed cross sections which corroborate these statements; <br />there are 300 -400 feet of interbedded low - permeability units consisting of mudstones, siltstones and <br />shales located both above and below the Southfield Mine workings At the main mine site, <br />groundwater in the alluvium /colluvium and in the Trinidad Sandstone may therefore be discounted <br />from any further discussion, (the water monitoring plan was approved on the basis that these <br />resources would not be affected by mining). <br />The PHC specifies that only shallow alluvial / colluvial groundwater has the potential to be affected <br />at the loadout. Since there are no groundwater monitoring locations at the loadout it will not discussed <br />further in this section. <br />Three formations remain under discussion: The Poison Canyon, the Raton and the Vermejo. In the <br />PHC section the prediction is made that groundwater impacts will be confined to "the interval <br />disturbed by mining extending up to and including abandoned mine workings in the Vento Seam <br />within the mine area ". Referring to figure 1, this interval is entirely within the Vermejo formation, <br />which is described elsewhere in the PAP as: <br />approximately 900 feet thick. Lithology of the Vermejo formation is highly variable with <br />significant cross - bedding and inter - bedding, and lithotypes varying from well cemented <br />sandstones to fine grained indurated siltstones. While many of the sandstones and coal seams <br />within the Vermejo formation are capable of storing and transmitting groundwater, the lenticular <br />nature and significant cross - bedding and inter - bedding which characterize this formation <br />effectively limit lateral continuity and consequent groundwater transmission capabilities." (Page <br />2.04.7 -2) <br />This description of the subsurface is consistent with the information gleaned from the Division's <br />analysis of drill logs (Exhibit 8 of the PAP). It is to be expected that multiple zones of perched <br />groundwater may exist within the interval expected to be affected by mining, (as well as in the Poison <br />Canyon and Raton formations, and the strata of the Vermejo formation above the Vento seam). To the <br />best of our knowledge, no attempt has been made to systematically locate, map or characterize these <br />perched zones; certainly such information does not exist with the Southfield mine PAP. Although <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.