Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />E1)viroiQMei)t,C. <br />LARRY E. O'BRIAN -- 7985 VANCE DRIVE, SUITE 205A <br />FOUNDER ARVADA, COLORADO 80003 <br />STEVAN L. O'BRIAN 303 - 423 -7297 <br />PRESIDENT f�l FAX 303 - 423 -7599 <br />January 29, 2015 OF RECLANKI ION! <br />r: ?lidN SAFETY <br />Mr. Tyler O'Donnell <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety <br />1313 Sherman St., Suite 215 <br />Denver, CO 80215 <br />Dear Tyler; <br />RE: Albert Frei and Sons, Inc. <br />Hatchery Pit - M- 2014 -043 <br />Adequacy Review 04 & Stipulation 01 <br />On behalf of my client Albert Frei and Sons, Inc., I am responding to your fourth <br />adequacy review letter dated January 5, 2015. I have included your review points that <br />need to be addressed in the order presented so the questions and answers will be in the <br />same document for easy reference. The memo is addressed in the same way. This should <br />address Stipulation No 1 and supply the revised Map Exhibit C -1 Mining Plan Map that has <br />the correct cross sections on it. <br />General Comments and Questions <br />29) Please address and respond to the following 11 questions asked in the attached Memo from <br />DRMS's staff. The attached memo addressed the review of slope stability provided by Deere and <br />Adult. Please address all changes resulting from the slope stability provided by Deere and Adult <br />in the permit text and the required maps <br />Attached are our responses to Mr. Hays' slope stability questions. The only change we <br />made was to correct the cross section C -C profile to move the edge of pavement for <br />Monaco St. from adjacent to the permit line to its true location 25 feet east of the permit <br />line. The cross sections provided on Map Exhibit C -1 - Mining Plan Map, have been <br />corrected, the sections now match the cut lines on the map, the Section A -A profile was <br />corrected to match the Deere and Ault Figure 1 and the label on the cut -line for Section <br />E -E was corrected. A five foot factor of safety setback was used on all sides except at <br />Section A -A since the Division has accepted the analysis for that side. <br />