My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-10-07_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981018A
>
2014-10-07_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:48:37 PM
Creation date
2/3/2015 9:08:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/7/2014
Section_Exhibit Name
Section V. Mine Surface Facilities Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• surrounding lands. The application of the latter category of criteria is particularly important on sites <br />that receive the greatest utilization by sheep during the winter and early spring. These are exposed <br />sites on south and west - facing slopes, and ridge and hill tops. <br />Fencing of reference areas 110, 140 and 150 was necessary to prevent continued depletion of the <br />herb layer as a result of sheep winter use and to improve the existing range condition. However, <br />Section 4.15.7(3)(d) of the regulations requires the reference areas to be managed in a manner that <br />is in accordance with the approved postmining land use. Therefore, before sampling for <br />comparative purposes, the reference areas must be made available for grazing. <br />Semi -arid sites characterized by harsh and limiting environmental conditions have been <br />successfully reclaimed in this region using the techniques around which this plan has been <br />constructed. Understanding the special treatments and well- coordinated maintenance programs is <br />important. The site - specific plans and evaluations provided for by this plan and the presence of a <br />resident reclamation specialist is integral to the success of the plan. Criteria used to evaluate <br />revegetation success for purposes of final bond release are as follows: (Table V -15 summarizes <br />these criteria). <br />(a) Perennial vegetative cover of the revegetated area must be at least 90% of the perennial <br />vegetative cover measured in the corresponding reference site. <br />• (b) Vegetation must be of a grazing tolerant type to present maximum resistance to damage by <br />domestic sheep grazing during winter. In addition, site characteristics, particularly soil <br />characteristics, must have properties favorable to the persistence of the revegetated sites <br />under the probable grazing regime. <br />• <br />(c) Perennial herbaceous productivity in revegetated sites will be at least 90% of the perennial <br />herbaceous productivity measured in the appropriate reference site or 90% of the expected <br />perennial herbaceous productivity as determined by USDA range site descriptions <br />(Illustration 25). <br />(d) For large permanent sites, a species diversity success standard of at least 2 perennial cool <br />season grasses, each with a relative vegetative cover equal to or greater than 3% will be <br />used. In addition, perennial forbs shall comprise a relative vegetative cover equal to or <br />greater than 3 %. On the larger permanent revegetated sites, any 3 perennial non - native <br />species combined should not exceed 80% relative vegetative cover, and no one non - native <br />species should exceed 60% relative vegetative cover. <br />Technical Revision #65 (6/2007) V -61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.