Laserfiche WebLink
• II.C.2.c Surface Water Quality Seven sites on and adjacent to the lease area were chosen for the <br />collection of baseline surface water quality data (see Figure II.C-11). Stations were established to obtain <br />data from streams and stock-watering ponds located above, on, and below the lease area. In addition, <br />selected samples were collected at other sites in the area on a noncontinuing basis to better inventory the <br />hydrologic conditions. Published information was also searched for local data. Water quality information <br />was found for the White River above Rangely, Colorado as published by the U.S. Geological Survey in their <br />annual Water Resources Data books. <br />Stations SW1-1, SW11-1, and SW31-1 were each equipped with three single-stage samplers (Guy and <br />Norman, 1970; see Figure II.C-12) set at different elevations in the stream channel for the collection of <br />water quality data and acrest-stage gauge (Buchanan and Somers, 1969; see Figure II.C-13) for estimating <br />peak flows. Stations SW23-1 and SW24-1 were equipped with two single-stage samplers and a crest <br />gauge. The crest gauge inlets were raised off the bottom of the stream channels to avoid potential <br />sedimentation problems. The single-stage samplers, which were originally developed to obtain sediment <br />samples near the water surface during the rising part of a hydrograph, were installed to allow the collection <br />of ephemeral runoff water quality data should access to the site be impossible during a runoff event or <br />should the event occur when the area was unattended. Samples collected in the stage samplers at a given <br />stream station were composited if the flow depth was great enough to fill more than one sampler. Channel <br />cross sections were also surveyed and astage-discharge curve developed for each of the stations based <br />• on Manning's open channel flow equation to allow an estimate to be made of the flow at the time a stage <br />sample was collected. Figures II.C-14 through II.C-16A and II.C-17 through II.C-19B present the profiles, <br />elevations, and stage-discharge curves of the nine sites. The remaining four surtace water quality stations <br />noted in Map 137 were established for the collection of grab samples. Samples were collected from the <br />designated stock ponds near the deep ehd affer wading into the pond. Stations on the White River above <br />and below the tributaries draining the lease area were established just below a bend in the river to take <br />advantage of the natural mixing action created when the water impinges against the river bank. Grab <br />samples collected from the river were near surface samples collected at only one stream vertical. Because <br />a depth-integrating sampler was not used and intake velocities were presumably not representative of <br />stream velocities, the water quality data collected on the White River should be interpreted with caution. <br />However, the approximations obtained by these nonstandard methods were regarded as adequate for this <br />inventory since more representative data are collected immediately downstream by the U.S. Geological <br />Survey. Water quality samples collected were analyzed according to the list in Table II.C-5 if a sufficient <br />quantity of water was available. This table was developed based on general guidelines given in the <br />Colorado Water Quality Control Act and was later approved by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board. Analytical methods utilized in the field and in the laboratory are summarized in Attachment A. Field <br />analyses were completed immediately upon sample collection. Samples were preserved for later <br />laboratory analysis according to methods outlined by the American Public Health Association et al. (1979). <br />Attachment B contains the results of chemical analyses of surface water samples collected within the <br />general area during the baseline period. <br />Permit Renewal #3 (Rev. 8/99) II.C-22 <br />