Laserfiche WebLink
Topic /subtopic <br />Compliance Issue <br />Date of Directive <br />Associated DRMS <br />Method of Directive staff <br />Comments <br />EFCI needs to bring the discussion on page 2.05.4- <br />, 27 in the PAP into agreement with pages 2.04.10 -5 <br />and 5a with regard to the average weighted <br />This is RN -06 item Number 15. <br />approach discussion. This should include the "new <br />EFCI responded; discussions between <br />Update of PAP /vegetation <br />portal reference area." <br />28- Mar -14 <br />RN -06 adequacy <br />JHB <br />EFCI and DRMS are ongoing. <br />Page 2.05.4 -27a in the PAP requires more <br />clarification regarding measurement of woody <br />plant densities and delineation of shrub clumps. An <br />acceptable way to clarify which area is defined as a <br />shrub clump versus seeded area would be to <br />This is RN-06 item Number 16. <br />reference a particular map (e.g., a map in an <br />EFCI responded; discussions between <br />Update of PAP /vegetation <br />Annual Reclamation Report). <br />28- Mar -14 <br />RN -06 adequacy <br />JHB <br />EFCI and DRMS are ongoing. <br />E -mail of 8/8/12 and letter of <br />11/28/12 sent from DRMS to EFCI <br />EFCI failed to repair or replace Well MW -NW when <br />directing them to remove the <br />Well /MW -NW <br />it was obstructed. <br />28- Jan -13 <br />NOV- 2013-002 <br />JHB, DIH <br />obstruction from MW -NW. <br />19 February 2013 <br />This is MT -06 item Number 12 and <br />Wells /sealing <br />EFCI has not sealed wells MW -08 and MW -10. <br />28 March 2014 <br />MT -06 and RN -06 <br />i <br />RDZ <br />RN -06 item Number 3. <br />Letter of 28 November 2012 sent <br />from DRMS to EFCI directing them to <br />get permit for Well MW -NW. <br />This was listed as Issue #2 in the MT- <br />06 findings. An EFCI representative <br />has stated that they are indeed <br />taking the actions to obtain these. As <br />of May 22, 2014 these applications <br />The Division has asked EFCI to obtain necessary <br />have not been filed, per Caleb Foy <br />Wells /well permits <br />well permits. <br />t— <br />19- Feb -13 <br />MT -06 findings <br />RDZ <br />with DWR. <br />The potential impact of subsidence on the Corley <br />This is MT -06 item Number 10 and <br />Company well needs to be analyzed by EFCI. If <br />RN -06 item Number 1. EFCI stated <br />necessary, EFCI will need to develop a plan to <br />19 February 2013 <br />that a formal agreement with the <br />Wells /well protection <br />mitigate damage to the well caused by subsidence. 28 March 2014 <br />MT -06 and RN -06 <br />RDZ <br />I Corley Company is pending. <br />Table_of_ Unresolved _Directives_to_EFCI.xlsx Page 4 <br />