My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-06-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2013-06-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2021 11:04:15 AM
Creation date
1/29/2015 9:11:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/3/2013
Doc Name
Groundwater Review Related to Citizen Complaint (Memo)
From
Mike Boulay
To
Dan Hernandez
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dan Hernandez Page 10 <br />June 3, 2013 <br />Notice of Violation CV- 2013 -002, issued to Energy Fuels Coal, Inc on January 28, 2013 for the <br />permittee's failure to ensure that the well continues to function as designed. Likewise, MW -16 is <br />very limited in its usefulness as a monitoring well. The well has silted -up to approximately 110 <br />feet below ground surface leaving 4 feet of perforated casing above the current depth. Since the <br />well screen is 30 feet in length the coal seam is no longer monitored. It now monitors only a <br />very small portion of the Vermejo above the coal. MW -16 has been dry beginning in December <br />2001 until June 2004 and has remained dry from 2006 -2011. MW -23 and MW -65 are the only <br />viable wells remaining in the monitoring plan. MW -23 is up- gradient from the mine workings <br />and is completed in the Red Arrow Coal Seam. MW -65 is completed in the Jack O'Lantem Coal <br />Seam and is down gradient from all Southfield Mine workings. <br />The ongoing monitoring program was initiated in 1981. Evaluation of groundwater quality is <br />based upon chemical analyses of groundwater samples from the monitoring wells described <br />above. Chemical parameter were selected for analyses using DRMS's guidance document <br />Guidelines for the Collection of Baseline Water Quality and Overburden Geochemistry Data. <br />The baseline conditions as described in the PAP were compared to recent available data from the <br />Annual Hydrology Reports. These data were tabulated for each of the three monitoring wells in <br />current monitoring plan for which data is available for. Indicator parameters including TDS, <br />Mn, and Fe were selected for comparison because they are important parameters and they are <br />required by Rule 2.04.7 for baseline characterization. A summary table one for each well (MW- <br />16, MW -23, and MW -65) is included in Appendix D. The data do not show any significant <br />trends between the baseline information and recent samples. Likewise there is no discernible <br />trend between up- gradient and down - gradient monitoring points. All three wells for which <br />baseline data was collected showed exceedances of the iron and manganese standards in the <br />baseline samples (Regulation No. 41 The Basic Standards for Ground Water, Table 2 — Domestic <br />Water Supply). Samples from MW -23 and MW -65 exceeded the manganese standard in more <br />recent samples from these wells on several occasions. However, the manganese exceedances in <br />these wells is on the same order of magnitude as the baseline samples so no discernible trend is <br />identifiable. As stated in the PAP, groundwater within the mine area has a neutral pH and <br />relatively high levels of sodium, sulfate, and iron. Based on analysis results there does not <br />appear to be any significant decrease in coal seam groundwater quality resulting from the <br />Southfield Mining operation as compared to coal seam groundwater quality prior to the <br />Southfield Mine operation. <br />Surface Water Considerations <br />The mine and adjacent areas are drained by the Magpie, Newlin and Second Alkali Creek <br />drainage. Newlin Creek is considered a perennial stream from its headwaters to the point of <br />diversion for the City of Florence municipal water supply upstream of the mine area. With <br />diversion of essentially the entire surface base flow of Newlin Creek, flows down gradient of the <br />diversion are ephemeral as are flows for Magpie and Second Alkali Creeks. Due to either <br />limited drainage areas or upstream diversion, the ephemeral drainages typically flow only in <br />response to runoff from spring snowmelt and major thunderstorm events Except for sporadic <br />flow occurrences, the ephemeral stream channels are typically dry throughout much of the year <br />When flow does occur a significant portion of surface flow is lost to the groundwater system <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.