My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-01-20_REVISION - P2009025 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Prospect
>
P2009025
>
2015-01-20_REVISION - P2009025 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 11:33:57 AM
Creation date
1/26/2015 4:30:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
P2009025
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/20/2015
Doc Name
CARD comments MD03
From
Jim Woodward
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
MD3
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Act defines a "mining operation" as development or extraction of a mineral from its natural <br />occurrences on affected land. Since the proposed activity is development rather than <br />prospecting, the applicant must apply for a reclamation permit. Because the proposed activity is <br />new and unproven, and involves the extraction of uranium, the Division should classify the <br />proposed activity as a Designated Mining Operation ( "DMO ") and apply the rules for DMOs <br />accordingly. <br />2. The description of the proposed activity in the application is vague and omits <br />necessary details. <br />Even if one assumes the proposed activity is prospecting, which it clearly is not, the application <br />is incomplete and lacks the details needed for the Division and members of the public to <br />determine what the applicant intends to do and to assess potential impacts to groundwater and <br />the environment. <br />The applicant's cover letter appears to imply that the proposed UBHM testing will be conducted <br />in a single drill hole, but there is no definitive statement that only one drill hole will be used. <br />In addition, the following details of the proposed activity are missing: <br />a. Location of the drill hole used for UBHM testing. The map provided by the applicant <br />does not identify the location of the drill hole or the location of related surface facilities <br />including rigs, pumps, holding tanks, and other equipment. <br />b. Distance between the drill hole used for UBHM testing and any groundwater monitoring <br />wells. <br />c. Procedures for baseline water quality sampling and testing from monitoring wells, <br />including a list of constituents to be analyzed. <br />d. Frequency of water quality sampling and testing from groundwater monitoring wells <br />during and after UBHM testing. <br />e. Procedures for reporting baseline water quality data and subsequent sampling and testing <br />data to the Division. <br />f. Water source for the injection water, expected quantity required, expected consumptive <br />use, and compliance with the State Engineer's regulations. <br />g. Water quality of the injection water and any expected treatment prior to injection or re- <br />injection. <br />h. Steps to be taken to ensure that any water storage tanks are adequately cleaned prior to <br />use and will not contaminate injection water. <br />i. Estimated amount of naturally- occurring dissolved oxygen contained in the injection <br />water. <br />j. Target depth for UBHM testing and the related geological formation(s). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.