My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-01-26_REPORT - C1981020 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981020
>
2015-01-26_REPORT - C1981020 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 10:34:29 AM
Creation date
1/26/2015 10:23:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981020
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/26/2015
From
J. E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2014
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
ZTT
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2014 AHR McClane & Munger Canyon Mines Page 4 <br />Future Water Inflow <br />When mining resumes development will be to the south where the coal seam is <br />relatively dry. Since most of the water generated in the mine comes from the <br />sealed areas in the north, the water inflow should be relatively constant or slowly <br />decreasing. <br />As shown on Figure 4.2 -3, the saturated strata appear to outcrop in the valley <br />formed by the north split of Munger Canyon. Since the strata in the area dip at <br />four percent to the northeast, water may be infiltrating the seam along the valley <br />bottom. Any water infiltrating the strata at this location will flow down dip until the <br />aquifer is totally saturated unless there is an area where water may escape. The <br />elevation of the saturated zone would approximate the elevation of the outcrop <br />(5,600 ft) if no water flows out of the strata at a lower elevation. There are no <br />known springs or seeps that would allow escape of the water from the zone of <br />saturation so it can be expected the coal seam will be saturated near the outcrop <br />elevation. <br />Munger Canyon Mine <br />The Munger Mine has been sealed and the disturbed areas were graded and <br />seeded in 2007. There was no water encountered in mine; therefore, there has <br />been no effect on the hydrologic regime of the area. The current mine workings <br />are shown on Figure 4. <br />Precipitation <br />Because of budget restraints, the Bureau of Land Management did not monitor <br />the rain gage in Ashford Canyon. Therefore, there is no precipitation data to <br />report for 2014. <br />Effect of the Mine on the East Salt Creek Regime <br />Surface Water <br />Due to the limited disturbance of the mines there is little chance any significant <br />effect on the quantity or quality of the surface waters near either mine sites has <br />occurred. As the Division notes in its approval package for the Munger Canyon <br />Mine, the total area that will be disturbed by both mine sites amounts to 0.12 <br />percent of the area of the East Salt Creek drainage basin above the mines. <br />Due to low flow conditions, samples were only taken at SW -1 during the first and <br />second quarter of 2014 and SW -8 during the second quarter 2014. Results are <br />shown in Table 4. Historically, results from the samples collected from East Salt <br />Creek above and below the mine site are generally the same for all parameters. <br />The McClane Canyon Mine only discharged to East Salt Creek during October <br />2013. A routine quarterly wet tests was performed. No pattern of toxicity was <br />found. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.