My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-01-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981012 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2015-01-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981012 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:56:44 PM
Creation date
1/23/2015 9:45:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/21/2015
Doc Name
Notice of Filing of Report of the Monitor in the Canadian Proceeding
From
US Bankruptcy Court
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
LDS
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-33- <br />(d) the current market for coal - related assets, as more particularly described in the <br />Pre - Filing Goldfarb Affidavit. <br />Affected Unsecured Creditors Class and WARN Act Plaintiffs Class <br />82. As of the date of this Second Report, the Monitor notes that: <br />(a) the collective value of the Secured Noteholders Allowed Unsecured Claim and <br />the allowed Convenience Claims represents approximately 83% of the total value <br />of allowed and asserted Affected Unsecured Claims; and <br />(b) the number of Secured Noteholders and holders of allowed Convenience Claims <br />represents approximately 63% of the total number of Persons with allowed and <br />asserted Affected Unsecured Claims. <br />83. Pursuant to the Meetings Order, Convenience Creditors will be deemed to vote in <br />favour of the Plan unless they indicate to the Monitor in writing that they intend to vote against <br />the Plan and do vote against the Plan at the Unsecured Creditors Meeting. In addition, Cline and <br />Marret have entered into a support agreement pursuant to which Marret (on behalf of the <br />Secured Noteholders) has agreed to support the Recapitalization and the Plan. Therefore, the <br />Secured Noteholders and the Convenience Creditors have the ability to ultimately approve the <br />Plan at the Unsecured Creditors Meeting. <br />84. In the event that the requisite quorum is not present at the WARN Act Plaintiffs <br />Meeting or if it is determined that there are no Voting Claims in the WARN Act Plaintiffs Class <br />and, pursuant to the Meeting Order, the WARN Act Plaintiffs Class is combined with the <br />Affected Unsecured Creditors Class, the Secured Noteholders and the Convenience Creditors <br />will still have the ability to ultimately approve the Plan at the Unsecured Creditors Meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.