Laserfiche WebLink
TCLLC on September 9, 2013. TCLLC replied to this second adequacy review letter on September 10, <br />2013. Based on these two adequacy review letters, the Division addressed all of its adequacy concerns <br />for RN -06. The Division did not receive any comment letters from any local, state or federal agencies for <br />RN -06. <br />On February 28, 2013 (letter dated February 26, 2013) the Division received an objection and comment <br />letter (Objection Letter) from Mr. Alan Hassler, Esq. on behalf of an adjacent landowner (the Trust). The <br />Letter outlined five objections to the proposed permit renewal and requested an informal conference, <br />pursuant to Rule 2.07.3(6). The issues and objections included an objection to publishing the public <br />notice four times versus five times, an objection to the location of a security gate on the Terror Creek <br />Loadout property, an objection to the leasing of the Loadout's shop and parking area to a trucking <br />company, an objection to the Loadout operating in accordance with its license agreement for the crossing <br />of the Fire Mountain Canal and an objection to the Loadout's operating in accordance with its highway <br />access permit. The Division determined that the only objection within its jurisdiction was the publication <br />of the legal notice and that the legal notice was published in accordance with Rule 2.07.3(2). The <br />Division responded to the Objection Letter via e-mail on March 5, 2013. <br />An informal conference was subsequently scheduled for March 28, 2013, to be held at the Terror Creek <br />Loadout office. Notice of the informal conference was sent to all interested parties on March 11, 2013 <br />and, pursuant to Rule 2.07.3(6)(b)(ii), a public notice regarding the time, date and location of the informal <br />conference was published in the Delta County Independent on March 13, 2013. Following the informal <br />conference there were several e -mails and correspondence exchanged between Mr. Hassler, the attorney <br />for TCLLC, and the Division's attorney. Since several issues remained unresolved following the informal <br />conference, a second meeting was scheduled and held on January 9, 2014. Based on the meetings and <br />exchanges, the Trust has withdrawn the objections regarding the leasing of the Loadout's shop and <br />parking area to a trucking company, the Loadout operating in accordance with its permit to cross the Fire <br />Mountain Canal and the Loadout operating in accordance with its highway access permit. The remaining <br />two objections have not been withdrawn. The Division is proceeding with its proposed decision over the <br />Trust's two remaining objections pursuant to the following analysis. <br />A. Terror Creek provided proper notice of the permit renewal application. <br />Trust's Objection: C.R.S. § 24- 70- 106(2)(d) requires five publications in a newspaper, but Terror Creek <br />published the public notice required by Rules 2.07.3(2) and 2.08.5(2)(c) four times. Objection Letter, p. <br />1. <br />Division's Response: Terror Creek satisfied the publication requirements of the Act and Rules. An <br />operator is required to publish public notice of a complete renewal application "once a week for four <br />consecutive weeks." C.R.S. § 34 -33- 118(2); Rule 2.07.3(2). According to the Affidavit of Publication <br />from the Delta County Independent, the Terror Creek published the public notice for the permit renewal <br />on January 9, 2013, January 16, 2013, January 23, 2013, and January 30, 2013. The Trust does not <br />dispute that the notice was published on these four consecutive dates. <br />The Trust instead argues that a separate statutory section — C.R.S. § 24- 70- 106(2)(d)— required Terror <br />Creek to publish the notice a fifth successive time. Relevant language from the section states: <br />For the purpose of defining and clarifying ambiguities in the various statutes requiring <br />the publication of legal notices and advertisements, but not for the purpose of increasing <br />any period of publication or the number of publications required by any statute, the <br />meaning and intent of any law governing the publication of legal notices and <br />advertisements, except as otherwise expressly provided, is declared to be as follows <br />where publication is required for:... Four weeks, publication once each week for five <br />successive weeks .... <br />4 <br />