My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-12-22_REPORT - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-12-22_REPORT - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:56:08 PM
Creation date
12/23/2014 8:12:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/22/2014
Doc Name
2011,2012 and 2013 AHR Reviews
From
DRMS
To
Energy Fuels Mining Company
Annual Report Year
2011
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RDZ
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
George Patterson <br />Page 2 <br />December 22, 2014 <br />Two sediment ponds remain at the mine site and two sediment ponds remained at the loadout <br />during the time of these AHRs (the loadout ponds have since been reclaimed). There was no <br />recorded discharge from the ponds for any of the three years. <br />Compliance with the Groundwater Monitoring Plan <br />As listed in Exhibit 25 of the PAP, there are four groundwater monitoring points on site to be <br />sampled semi - annually for water levels and for water quality: Well MW -65 is completed in the <br />Jack O 'Lantern coal seam; Well MW -23 is completed in the Red Arrow coal seam; Well MW- <br />16 is screened from the middle Jack O'Lantern to the bottom of the Red Arrow; and MW -NW is <br />a pipe open to the top of a mine void in the Red Arrow (more discussion on MW -NW below). <br />MW -16 and MW -23 are generally upgradient, and MW -65 is generally downgradient, of the <br />Southfield workings. Although these wells are not necessarily in the same seams, and the seams <br />do not appear to be hydrologically connected, they may be used to exemplify upgradient and <br />downgradient conditions. <br />All four points were monitored in the following months: <br />• June and December of 2011 <br />• June and November of 2012 <br />• June and December of 2013. <br />MW -16 and MW -NW were reported as dry during all three years (six sampling events). In all <br />six events, the samples taken from MW -23 and MW -65 were tested for all of the parameters <br />listed in Exhibit 25 of the PAP. <br />Issues with MW -NW have been well documented. MW -NW is not an actual "well." It is a 6- <br />inch steel pipe, without a screen, that extends to the top of the Red Arrow coal seam and is open <br />to the mine workings. It was originally built to dewater the workings and cannot function as a <br />monitoring well in the strict sense of the term. Furthermore, MW -NW continues to be obstructed <br />by a possible cave -in and a wooden block. Violation CV- 2013 -002 (failure to ensure that water <br />monitoring well MW -NW continues to function as designed) was issued in early 2013. <br />Review of Surface Water Data <br />No samples of surface water were collected for any of the six sampling events because of the <br />lack of flow. Therefore, no analysis is provided. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.