My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-12-19_REVISION - C1980005 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2014-12-19_REVISION - C1980005 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:56:07 PM
Creation date
12/19/2014 1:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/19/2014
Doc Name
Proposed Decison Findings of Complaince
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company, LLC
Type & Sequence
SL6
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the confluence with Bond Creek). <br />The total recoverable iron standard, 1.0 mg/l, was exceeded a total of seven times at Sites SSF 11 and <br />SSF 13 from 2011 to 2013. No exceedances of the iron standard occurred at SSB12 or NPDES8; <br />therefore, the exceedances are not likely caused by runoff from the Seneca II Mine. The nitrite <br />standard, 0.05 mg /1, was exceeded one time at Site SSF13 with a value of 0.06 mg /1. The nitrite <br />value at Site SSF 11, SSB12 and NPDES8 were below the 0.05 mg/1 value. Therefore, the <br />exceedance at Site SSF 13 was not likely caused by runoff of the Seneca II Mine. <br />Based on a review of the water quality data, no sites exceeded the sulfide standard of 0.002 mg/1, the <br />aquatic life ammonia standard detection limit of 0.05 mg /1, nor either the drinking water standard (2 <br />ug/1) nor the aquatic life standard (0.01 ug/1) for mercury. Based on the NPDES permit renewal, the <br />CDPHE performed a reasonable potential analysis on NPDES8 and determined that there was no <br />reasonable potential for the outfall to exceed the mercury limit; as -such, mercury monitoring is no <br />longer required at the NPDES8 outfall. <br />Five out of thirty -six samples from NPDES8 were greater than the chronic selenium standard of 4.6 <br />ug/1, with values between 5.9 and 17 ug /1. The potentially dissolved method is the method that is <br />required for NPDES compliance and the dissolved selenium method is used for assessing stream <br />compliance. No selenium exceedances occurred at any monitored surface sites downstream of <br />NPDES8. <br />For NPDES8, the five samples of the selenium noted were not NPDES permit limit exceedances_ <br />The permit limit for NPDES8 associated with selenium is to "Report" only. Sites SSB 12 and SSF 13 <br />downstream of NPDES8 are in compliance with the receiving stream standard for selenium. The <br />CDPHE uses the 85th percentile of dissolved selenium values over the past five years to determine <br />stream attainment of the selenium standard. At Site SSF 13, the sample data value is 0.5 ug/l. At Site <br />SSB12, the sample data value is at 3.91 ug /1. <br />The Seneca II Mine includes one monitored spoil spring (SSPG9), which is located upstream of, and <br />flows into, permanent Pond 008 (NPDES8). Due to the fact that the post- mining land use for the <br />Seneca II Mine has been approved as grazing and wildlife habitat, a review of the water quality data <br />was compared to the CWQCC surface water agricultural standards. One standard was exceeded for <br />the past three years. The manganese standard was exceeded once with a value of 0.262 mg/l. <br />However, as indicated in CWQCC Regulation 31, the standard of 0.2 mg/l applies to plants grown in <br />acidic ( <6.0 pH) soils. In alkaline soils, as found in the Seneca II Mine Permit area, a more <br />appropriate standard is 10 mg/l. <br />Permit Requirements of the Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS) <br />The Seneca II Mine maintains one outfall, Pond 008 (NPDES8), that is monitored under the CPDS <br />Permit No. CO- 0000221. Sample data were collected and reviewed for all required parameters and <br />sample analysis included testing for Whole Effluent Toxicity. Sample data have been reported on a <br />quarterly basis in discharge monitoring reports filed with the CDPHE and the CDRMS. These DMRs <br />indicate that no exceedances of permit limits have occurred in the past three water years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.