My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-12-08_REVISION - C1981014 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-12-08_REVISION - C1981014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:51 PM
Creation date
12/11/2014 1:52:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/8/2014
Doc Name
Letter From Landowner
From
K2T LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR43
Email Name
RDZ
MPB
DAB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
K2T LLC <br />Linda Saunders and Tena Gallagher, members <br />34315 Forest Park Dr. <br />Elizabeth, CO 80107 -7842 <br />Rob Zuber (rob.zuber @state.co.us), <br />Ginny Brannon (ginny.brannon @state.co.us) <br />Daniel Hernandez (daniel.hernandez @state.co.us) <br />Jeff Fugate (jeff.fugate @state.co.us) RECEIVED <br />Dave Berry (dave.berry @state.co.us) <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety DEC 0 8 2014 <br />1313 Sherman St Room 215 Division of Reclamation, <br />Denver, CO 80203 Mining & Safety <br />December 7, 2014 <br />As a partial property owner of 400 acres known as Southfield, K2T, LLC, objects to TR 43, EFCI's request to no longer monitor water <br />and a hearing at the March 25, 2015 board meeting. We also objected at the Phase I Bond Hearing regarding the lack of monitoring <br />wells in 2002. During the past 10 years of reclamation EFCI has only full data on one monitored well, MW23. MW23 is the <br />upslope monitoring well 149 -170 feet and not into the ground water which we believe to be at 350 feet. We base this on MWNW <br />(formerly the North Well data from 1985 -1995) and the downslope well (MW65) being monitored on Dr Corley's property at 350 feet. <br />CRS 2.07.6(2)(C) REQUIRES the Division to make an assessment of the probably cumulative impacts of all anticipated mining in the <br />general area of the hydrologic balance and that the coal mining operation proposed in the permit application has been designed to <br />prevent damage to the hydrologic balance outside the proposed permit area. We believe that the water level in MW23 decreased and <br />MW 16 has been reported dry and MW10 has been mined through, therefore this regulation has not been followed. <br />MW 10 (340 -402 feet next to the 40 acre refuse pile) was mined through in 2001. This monitoring well had water consistently and was <br />near a seepage area that produced water and that EFCI used for dewatering the mine. <br />MW16, near the old Vento house, has been reported dry since December 2005. <br />EFCI hydrology consultants mention the dewatering of the mine numerous times in their November, 2014 letter. Bishop, Brogden, and <br />Rump prepared the inflow reports in 1986 Annual Hydrology Report and reported 141.9 acre feet was removed from the North Well <br />(MWNW). Bishop, Brogden also stated in September 19, 2013 letter that the mine would not fill up for 120 -160 years or meet <br />equilibrium. 4.05.12 120(2)(j)(IV) ensures the protection of the groundwater recharge capability to be at premining levels and not in <br />120 years. The quantity of water that was removed from the mine from all wells (based on inflow reports and available Hydrology <br />Reports) by dewatering from 1985 -2000 was 150 million gallons of water. <br />In his June 15, 1984 letter Robert Biddle stated on p.20, "Since Newlin Creek is a stream being undermined, it is important to ensure <br />that subsidence will not induce stream depletions. The effect on Newlin Creek can best be monitored by inflow reports. Future results <br />from the mine inflow study may show the need for surface monitoring if significant inflows are experienced below Newlin Creek." p.21 <br />"The mine is presently incurring water sources in both the north sections (Newlin Creek) and southern sections." <br />All of the applications for the wells used to dewater were denied by the State Water Engineer and have never been permitted. The <br />North Well was tagged by the Division of Water Resources in 1991 and EFCI still used it to dewater until at least 1995 when the DRMS <br />required them to put in a closed loop system. DRMS staff have not confirmed that this system was ever in place. <br />Our two family LLCs who own the property need uncontaminated water to insure that cattle can graze on our reclaimed property, <br />which was the historical use of this property and is the main emphasis of our Southfield's Reclamation Plan. Our father, Bert <br />DeFellippie, grazed cattle here and therefore previously had a water source. Our grandfather, Tony Vento, mined this property <br />requiring water from 1935 -1972. <br />We request that EFCI drill three water wells into the Trinidad Aquifer and a new monitoring well into the mine tunnels not into areas <br />that have been retreat mined. These wells need to produce 10 gallons /minute at minimum according to our hydro - geologist. EFCI <br />needs to provide the pumping records at each depth from the driller and monitor each well for five years. MWNW needs to be <br />repaired or replaced because it was likely damaged by roof fall when the continuous miner was buried in 1995 and /or when County Rd <br />15 subsided. After that date all of the inflow reports are estimated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.