My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-05-12_PERMIT FILE - C2010089 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2014-05-12_PERMIT FILE - C2010089 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:43:54 PM
Creation date
12/11/2014 10:04:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/12/2014
Doc Name
Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3)
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3) The sandstones above the Dakota coals have historically been too poor in quality and too low in <br />flow rates to provide for useful wells. For this reason, no known wells in the vicinity of the mine <br />area have been completed in the Dakota Formation. It is very unlikely that any new wells will be <br />completed in the Dakota Formation in the vicinity since the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison <br />Formation provides significantly better water quality and flow rate and is located only 160 feet <br />deeper than the Dakota LDx Seam at NHN permit area. <br />4) The local wells are completed in the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation, which is <br />below the Dakota coals. Although this zone has significantly better quality water, these sandstones <br />are separated from the spoil by shale layers with very low permeabilities, therefore these aquifers <br />cannot be affected by the spoil water. <br />6) Impact Of Backfill Water Ouality On Surface Water Quality. <br />Spoil Water Quality The chemistry of the water interacting with the spoil is described in the <br />previous section. In order to determine the impact of the spoil water quality on the surface water, it <br />is first necessary to predict the expected quality of the spoil leachate for the NHN Mine. The <br />principal impact from a quality perspective is that any irrigation water will seep rapidly through <br />the spoil, increase in TDS and then discharge through a spoil spring. This is analogous to the old <br />Peabody Nucla Mine and the water quality should be similar to that of SS #l, (see New Horizon #1 <br />Area permit). The NHN spoil spring will issue to a tributary of Tuttle Draw which will impact the <br />quality of Tuttle Draw. <br />Timeframes of Elevated TDS in Spoil Water The time period that these slightly elevated levels <br />of TDS in the spoil water and spoil spring discharges is difficult to calculate. In 1994, the USGS <br />did a detailed study of the impacts of infiltration into spoil at the Seneca II Coal Mine in Routt <br />County, CO. This study is Water Resources Investigations Report 92 -4187 titled Hydrolo�y and <br />Geochemistry of a Surface Coal Mine in Northwest Colorado. Lysimeters were installed to <br />measure infiltration rates into the spoil, and samples of inflow water, spoil water and spring <br />discharge was analyzed for the entire area. It was determined that pyrite oxidation was the <br />principal cause of elevated TDS, and that the percent of pyrite in the spoil was the determining <br />factor in the length of time that the TDS would be elevated in the spoil water. A spoil pyrite <br />content of 1% by weight, for example, was predicted to fully oxidize in 1600 years (their Table <br />18). TDS levels in the spoil water were approximately 4500 ppm, which was a significant increase <br />over the overburden aquifer water in the area. The coal mine overburden at that site is somewhat <br />younger (upper Cretaceous) in age but is similar in lithologic character to that of the adjacent New <br />Horizon Mine. The USGS study methodology was used as a basis to predict the time frames of <br />slightly elevated TDS in the spoil water at the New Horizon Mine, (see New Horizon #2 Area <br />permit Section 2.05.6(3) ). The sulfur content in the overburden at NHN is similar to that at the <br />New Horizon Mine (see Table 2.04.6 -2 of Section 2.04.6 of this application). The result of that <br />prediction indicated that about 800 years would be required to oxidize the sulfur in the overburden <br />ection 2.05.6(3) Page 24 November 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.