Laserfiche WebLink
1) Interruption of Groundwater Flow and Drawdown. The bedrock zones, overburden and <br />coal, will be exposed or daylighted by the NHN excavation. There are no users or beneficial <br />uses for the relatively small amount of ground water that is currently moving through the <br />bedrock zones toward the cropline to the southwest. Recharge from irrigation (the major source <br />of recharge) will continue to the east, north and west of the NHN permit area as it currently does. <br />Irrigation water that now infiltrates into the bedrock zones at NHN will be diverted around the <br />mining area in a HDPE pipeline. Seepage out of the northward advancing high -wall will be <br />diminished from what is currently being experienced from the old Peabody high -wall because <br />the annual recharge from irrigation water flowing across the permit area will be eliminated. <br />In order to develop the impact assessment for groundwater flow and drawdown, two different <br />methodologies were utilized. First, the monitoring data from the old Peabody Nucla Mine were <br />analyzed to determine the annual volume of flow into the pit from actual observations and to also <br />determine the distance of drawdown (cone of depression) observed as the old Peabody Nucla <br />Mine advanced to the north (see Map 2.04.7 -1, "Old Peabody Nucla Mine Highwall "). The <br />second method involved the determination of pit inflow rates and drawdown in the adjacent <br />overburden and coal zones as a result of groundwater drainage from the bedrock zones into the <br />pit utilizing a version of the groundwater flow model MODFLOW. A description of the <br />modeling procedures and the assumptions used are provided in Appendix 2.05.6(3) -2. <br />Observation and Analysis Flow from the old mine backfill (SS #1, #2, and #3, see New <br />Horizon 1 Mine Permit) indicate that total seepage from that high -wall varied from a low of <br />about 17 gpm (during periods of no irrigation) to a high of about 52 gpm during irrigation <br />season. The high flow rates average about 42 gpm and the irrigation season is about 165 days <br />long. The low flow rates average about 17 gpm and represent no irrigation for about 200 days <br />per year. The average annual flow rate is therefore on the order of about 28 gpm or about 5390 <br />ft3 /day. This flow rate compares well with the flow rate of about 27 gpm calculated by <br />subtracting the flow in Nygren Draw (SW -N6) from the flow rate at NPDES 001, (see Table <br />2.04.7 -5 in Section 2.04.7). This further suggests that once the irrigation water is diverted into <br />the HDPE pipeline that highwall seepage should be more on the order of about 17gpm (< 3300 <br />ft3 /day) and then decrease as the bedrock zones dry out. <br />The bedrock zones are tight, with low transmissivity (measured OB and Coal Zone <br />transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity at 58 ft2 /day and 2.1 ft /day respectively at GW -N9) <br />which results in limited but steep cones of depression. The old Peabody Nucla Mine (New <br />Horizon #1 Area) is again instructive as the hydrograph of GW -N8 (see pg. 7 -1 -75 of New <br />Horizon 1 Mine Area Permit) shows the water level was first affected by the mining in <br />November 1980. At that time the coal face was about 760 ft from hole GW -N8. Total draw <br />down at GW -N8 after 2 years and 9 months was 12.24 ft. Monitor hole GW -N9 at a distance of <br />854 ft from the final high -wall has never been affected, (see GW -N8 and GW -N9 hydrographs in <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -2; Figures 2.05.6(3) -2a and 2.05.6(3) -2b). Based on the evaluation of these <br />observations, water level drawdown in the bedrock zones is expected to only extend about 590 <br />Section 2.05.6(3) Page 12 October 2013 (TR -05) <br />E: \New Horizon \DRMS \NHN Permit \04_Technical Revisions TR \TR -05 \Documents from Jason \2.05.6(3) Protection of Hydrologic Balance TR- OS.doc <br />