My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-11-14_PERMIT FILE - C1996083
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-11-14_PERMIT FILE - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:23 PM
Creation date
12/11/2014 9:18:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/14/2014
Doc Name
11/10/2014 Stability Evaluation Coverfill Stockpiles Huddleston-Berry
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume IX Coal Mine Waste Disposal Area No. 2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Huddleston -Berry <br />3.4 Results <br />Based upon DRMS Rule 4.10.4(2), a minimum Factor -of- Safety (FS) of 1.5 is <br />required for the analyses to indicate a stable condition. <br />below. <br />The results of the analyses are included in Appendix A and are summarized <br />• Section B -B' without Coverfill Circular —minimum FS = 1.649 <br />• Section B -B' without Coverfill Block —minimum FS = 1.794 <br />• Section B -B' with Coverfill Circular — minimum FS = 1.599 <br />• Section B -B' with Coverfill Block — minimum FS = 1.623 <br />• Section C -C' without Coverfill Circular —minimum FS = 1.897 <br />• Section C -C' without Coverfill Block —minimum FS = 1.922 <br />• Section C -C' with Coverfill Circular — minimum FS = 1.747 <br />• Section C -C' with Coverfill Block —minimum FS = 1.742 <br />3.5 Discussion <br />As indicated above, the results of the analyses yielded factors -of- safety for the <br />existing slopes along gob pile #2 above 1.5. The analyses also indicate that the coverfill <br />stockpiles will not dramatically reduce the stability of gob pile #2. <br />It is important to note that the observed factors -of- safety are based upon the <br />assumptions above regarding shear strength, unit weight of coverfill, and piezometric <br />surface. In order to evaluate the impacts of changes in these parameters on the stability, <br />HBET conducted sensitivity analyses. The results of the sensitivity analyses are included <br />in Appendix B and are summarized in the following sections. <br />Unit Weight of Cover W <br />As discussed previously, the unit weight of the coverfill is likely to be less than <br />the unit weight of the in- place, consolidated native soils. HBET believes that the selected <br />value of 115 pcf is appropriate for the loosely placed coverfill. However, the sensitivity <br />analyses included increasing the unit weight of the coverfill in the model to 120 pcf. At <br />this unit weight, the factors -of- safety for both Sections B -B' and C -C' did not fall below <br />1.5. <br />Friction Angle of Gob <br />As indicated in the referenced documents, previous sensitivity analyses completed <br />by Buckhorn included friction angles (�') of 30° and 32 °. However, the triaxial shear <br />testing completed in 2005 showed fully drained friction angles of between 33.6° and <br />34.3 °. In addition, triaxial shear testing completed in October 2013 showed a drained <br />friction angle of 34.5 °. <br />X:\2008 ALL PROJECTS \01349 -Bowie Resources, LLC \01349 -0001 Bowie Mine\200 - Geo \Gob 2 \Cowrfill Stability \01349 -0001 R091914R2.dm 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.